This Report

This report is one of the few of its type on the Internet, if not the only broad-spectrum examination of Hanford Nuclear Reservation and certain parts of its history which have raised a number of questions for many years, especially in more recent times.

Presenting the unpolished, raw data indicating the situation facing the general public because of those things which have gone on and are going on at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

This report looks at the Columbia River, the multi-state regional aquifer system, the geology in the Hanford region, the cleanup project and potential side effects, and the spike in birth defects in the territory surrounding Hanford.

The vitrification plant is considered, along with project delays and missed milestones. Mismanagement and concerns by engineers are also considered, plus the potential end result of what appears to be a substandard vit plant.

This report notes US DOE plans for using Hanford as the National Radioactive and Chemical Waste Dump. What appears to be an ongoing, large scale tritium "mining" project is also examined, along with potentially irrepairable damage to the important, multi-level aquifer system and the general health of the people inhabiting this region.


The Columbia River

There has been much talk about the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and its potential problems created for the Columbia River.

It is often stated that radioactive waste is leaking toward the river in the groundwater. But, most sources make it appear that radioactive waste is not yet in the river.

It is time to look at the real truth.

Scroll down to page 13 in the PDF file linked below. It indicates that strontium-90 "plumes are now flowing through the groundwater into the river."

Page 15 indicates that tritium is already getting into the river.



There is actually a lot more to this story about radioactive materials from Hanford getting into the Columbia River and the regional aquifers.

More information on this subject is presented immediately below, plus additional information will be presented further down on this page.


Another Source

The following link is to a lengthy government report called "Distribution of Radionuclides in the Columbia River Streambed, Hanford Reservation to Longview, Washington." It appears to have been published in 1975. You may need to open the file with Adobe to view it.

Starting at page O-9, the measurements of four radionuclides (chromium-51, zinc-65, scandium-46 and cobalt-60) in the river sediments are given. Page 0-24 states: "Chromium-51 (60.1 percent) and zinc-65 (34.5 percent) accounted for nearly all of the radionuclide inventory in the Columbia River." Again, that was in 1975.




Nuclear Museum

The following link accesses a webpage for the Washington Nuclear Museum and Educational Center. The following information comes from that page.

"There were five different radionuclides that contributed the most to the contamination of the Columbia River. These were phosphorus-32, zinc-65, arsenic-76, neptunium-239 and sodium-24."

The webpage shows that splits in the metal covering of fuel elements "allowed small chunks of radioactive fuel to be discharged into the river with the cooling water. The largest of these chunks weighed more than a pound. Hanford experienced almost 2,000 of these fuel element failures."



So, there were about 2,000 fuel element failures and chunks of radioactive fuel going into the river. This means that there could be hundreds of pounds of the radioactive fuels scattered in the river.

There is other important information in the webpage linked above. It states that: "The radiation in the Columbia reached the Pacific Ocean and contaminated shellfish along the Washington and Oregon Coasts."


More Info

The link below shows that in 1952, scientists estimated that "slug ruptures had accounted for the release of approximately 11,500 curies of gross beta-emitters to the Columbia River." They also noted that "slug ruptures had become more frequent and severe which caused the release of approximately 21,000 curies into the Columbia in 1954."

The link states that an increase of production and power levels in the reactors by 1958 caused "slug ruptures to contribute around 45,000 curies per year to the Columbia River." Furthermore, "concentrations could be as much as twelve times this amount if slug ruptures were not detected for at least four hours."



Really now, how much irradiated nuclear fuel is sitting in the bottom of the Columbia River? How much plutonium is down there? Talk about a terrorist "grab bag."


The Fuel Rods

The information linked below indicates that the highly radioactive, aluminum-clad fuel elements or fuel rods were initially composed of metallic uranium and activation materials.

In the reactors, a certain portion of the uranium was converted into plutonium, plus other fission products. It appears that some of these fission products are radioactive cesium and strontium, plus technetium.




Reprocessing

The page linked below is titled 'Nuclear Chemistry: Reprocessing Spent Fuel.' It speaks of the reprocessing of fuel rods for nuclear weapons. It gives some indication of the products in fuel rods from nuclear reactors.



The page linked below declares: "Used fuel contains a wide array of nuclides in varying valency states." In the processing of a "spent" nuclear fuel rod, the plutonium and uranium are separated out. The remaining solution of high-level waste contains "fission products and minor actinides," these being things like neptunium, americium and curium.



Regarding this high-level waste, the page linked above states: "It is highly radioactive and continues to generate a lot of heat." The page also mentions transuranics (TRU).

This link states that TRU are "elements having atomic numbers greater than that of uranium." These elements appear to have longer half-lives.

Besides the elements already mentioned above that are associated with fuel rods, the following TRU elements may need to be added to the list: berkelium, californium, einsteinium, fermium, mendelevium and nobelium.


Fission Products

The information above notes that "fission products" are contained in "spent" fuel rods. This link states that "nuclear fission products are the atomic fragments left after a large atomic nucleus fissions." These are smaller nuclei which are created by the splitting of the original nucleus.

The link above states that many of the isotopes in the fission products "have a very short half-life, and therefore give off huge amounts of radiation." It also states: "It is these short half-life isotopes that make spent fuel so dangerous."


A Decrease

The webpage linked below shows that there was a decrease of radionuclides in the Columbia River after the last of the Hanford reactors using direct discharge into the river closed in 1971.







Main Concerns

Our main concerns now are from the radioactive waste scattered around the large Hanford site, plus all the radioactive "witches brew" that was treated with chelating agents and is leaking into the ground from the defective storage tanks.


River and Aquifer

The chelated and suspended radioactive waste particles are very mobile in water.

The "plume" of waste particles in the groundwater is currently getting into the Columbia River and a lot more is on its way.

The complex, regional aquifer system below the Hanford region is also seriously contaminated with radioactive elements. There is not a lot that can be done for the aquifer, at this point.


Nuclear Fuel

While we are considering the Hanford site and the major cleanup, we should not forget about those potentially hundreds of pounds of radioactive fuel chunks (containing uranium, plutonium and a variety of other radioactive elements) which are scattered around in the bottom of the river, somewhere.

With the great weight, high density and high specific gravity of uranium and plutonium, plus other radioactive products, the lost pieces of radioactive fuel likely sunk into the bottom of the river. Possibly the fuel pieces made their way through the sediments and are now residing at bedrock.


Terrorist's Delight

Possibly all this radioactive fuel in the bottom of the Columbia River needs to be recovered by the proper authorities, before some terrorist organization gets their hands on enough radioactive materials (uranium, plutonium, etc.) to build a device which can eliminate a few of our cities.





In The River

The link below declares: "In June 2005, GAP released a report showing previously unknown measures of radioactivity around the perimeter of Hanford. The study includes the first reports of plutonium in Columbia River marine life."


Many Contaminants

The following is also found in the article: "In addition to plutonium being found for the first time in fish, increased levels of strontium, mercury, beryllium, uranium, and cesium were detected in aquatic creatures."




Important Note

There is something very important to note. The link above states: "An area of the Columbia River 20 miles upstream from the Hanford site contained high uranium readings."

About twenty miles upstream from Hanford is generally the area located midway between Priest Rapids Dam and Wanapum Dam, on the Columbia River.

Wanapum Dam is named after the Wanapum People, a special tribe of Native American Indians who formerly lived in this area.


Area Access

From Hanford, the area showing high uranium readings is accessed via Highway 243, on the northwest corner of the Hanford reservation.


General Landmarks

The area displaying "high uranium readings" would be on the Columbia River, about 10 miles below Wamapum Dam. The area above Wamapum Dam is where Interstate-90 crosses the Columbia River on the Vantage Bridge.

The existing Vantage Bridge is actually the second Vantage Bridge. This second bridge was built in 1962. The first Vantage Bridge, which existed during the early stages of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, was built in 1927.


Opening  "The Door"

At this point, a very important and key question needs to be asked.

At some point, was this upstream area, 20 miles from Hanford and about 10 miles upstream of the lower end of Priest Rapids, used for dumping uranium waste from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, and possibly other radioactive materials as well?

Illegal night dumping of radioactive materials and other hazardous industrial wastes is relatively common in our world. Many times, this illegal dumping has occurred in rivers.

But, there may be more to this story. There may be a logical explanation for this area of high radioactivity in the Columbia River, upstream of Hanford and the area of Priest Rapids. This potential explanation is one which is very hard to consider.

A person could begin to question what has actually gone on at Hanford in the past, plus how all the nuclear waste was really handled in earlier times. It could also make a person begin to question what is actually going on at Hanford today.

There is a very good reason why the government still has "a Classified stamp" on many of the documents about Hanford.

This leads us into the following section.





Wanapum People

The Wanapum People were a peaceful tribe of Native American Indians who dwelt on the Columbia Plateau. They did not believe in, nor partake in armed conflict with white settlers in their region, nor with the U.S. Government.

The area now occupied by Hanford Nuclear Reservation was formerly part of the territory occupied by the Wanapum People, plus other Native American tribes.

Fishing in the Columbia River has always been important to the culture of the Wanapum People. Fish from the river is commonly used in tribal ceremonies and heavily for personal subsistence.

Fish from the river is important enough to the existence of the Wanapum cultural that the Government has passed laws to protect their fishing rights.


Earlier History

In the mid-1800s, many Native American tribes were forced onto reservations. But, the Wanapum People have a rather unique situation.

The Wanapum had not warred against the white settlers or the U.S. Government. They were therefore not party to the Treaty With The Yakima, 1855.

As a result, the Wanapum generally tended to remain in the area of Priest Rapids, on the Columbia River.


Fishing in Jeopardy

The webpage linked here declares: "In 1937, the Game Warden of Benton County informed the Wanapum that they could no longer fish for salmon at the traditional locations."

The Wanapum had a friend named Lucullus McWhorter, who was an Indian advocate. Lucullus worked hard with the Washington State government on behalf of the Wanapum and their historic fishing rights.


Forced Move

When the Hanford Nuclear Reservation came into existence, the Wanapum People and other Native American tribes were forced out of a large portion of their ancestral lands.

In the early 1940s, because of Hanford, the peaceable Wanapum People were forced to confine their activities along the river to the area near Priest Rapids and further upstream. The Wanapum People resided along the river near Priest Rapids even into the 1950s and later.


River Radiation

It appears there could be much more to the story of the Wanapum People.

There could also be much more to the story of those radioactive materials in the Columbia River, about 20 miles upstream from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

This investigation will now present some background information, which leads up to an important set of questions.


Operation Paperclip

After the fall of Nazi Germany in World War II, a large number of Nazi scientists and specialists were illegally brought into the United States under Operation Paperclip, starting in 1945.

To allow these Nazis entry into the United States, the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA) created "false employment and political biographies for the scientists," which virtually "whitewashed" them of their Nazi backgrounds and leanings and allowed them access to the United States.

A number of nuclear scientists from Nazi Germany were also brought to the United States under various operations associated with Operation Paperclip.


U.S. DOE Contract

The webpage linked here speaks of a Nazi war criminal named Otto Ambros.

Regarding Otto Ambros, it states that "at Nuremberg he was tried for mass murder and slavery. But he was given clemency [in 1951] by U.S. high commissioner [of Allied Germany] John McCloy and later given a U.S. Department of Energy contract."

The news article linked here is actually from page 7-A of the Sunday, June 6, 1982 edition of the 'Daily News' of Bowling Green, Kentucky. The article declares that Otto Ambros "had been consulted by several organizations and agencies, including the U.S. Department of Energy."

The document linked here (on Adobe Reader, page 6 of 8) declares: "Ambros oversaw I.G. Auschwitz in all its horror." Yes, Auschwitz was one of the major, very brutal extermination camps of Nazi Germany. The document also states: "Ambros became a high-level advisor to a major American corporation, W.R. Grace and Company, and a consultant to the United States Department of Energy."

At this point it must be noted that the U.S. Department of Energy is the agency which is in charge of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.


Manhatten Project

Hanford Nuclear Reservation was part of the Manhatten Project, which produced the first atomic bombs used in warfare.

Regarding the Manhatten Project, this link states: "The project was also charged with gathering intelligence on the German nuclear energy project." As part of this project, " they gathered nuclear materials and documents, and rounded up German scientists."


Many Nazi Scientists

Regarding Operation Paperclip, the caption below the video linked here declares that "1600 German scientists and engineers were given government contracts - many of them hard-core Nazi ideologues."


Einstein and the Concerned Scientists

The renowned physicist Albert Einstein and the Federation of American Scientists were greatly concerned when they saw all the Nazi scientists brought into the United States and placed in key positions in American industrial, scientific and educational institutions.

In the book 'Red Moon Rising', by Matthew Brzezinski, on page 85, is written the following, regarding the flood of Nazi scientists being brought into the United States:

"On December 30, 1946, Albert Einstein and the Federation of American Scientists wrote to President Truman, arguing, 'We hold these individuals to be potentially dangerous carriers of racial and religious hatred. Their former eminence as Nazi party members and supporters raises the issue of their fitness to become American citizens and hold key positions in American industrial, scientific and educational institutions."


Nazis and Eugenics

The Nazis were part of the international eugenics movement.

This link states: "After the eugenics movement was well established in the United States, it was spread to Germany. California eugenicists began producing literature promoting eugenics and sterilization and sending it overseas to German scientists and medical professionals."

It is common knowledge that the Nazi German scientists were into human experimentation, even performing extremely brutal experiments. They also performed devastating radiation experiments on people.

Later, Nazi scientists who had performed crimes against humanity were brought to the United States and placed in key positions. It is of concern to note that human experimentation and radiation experiments appear to have increased greatly in the United States after that time.

Information relating to some of the human radiation experiments in the United States, even experiments on the unsuspecting public, is presented or linked on this webpage.


Nuremberg Trials

The webpage linked here is from the George Mason University, History News Network. It speaks of the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial at Nuremberg, Germany, after World War Two. After these trials, many Nazis were condemned to death for crimes against humanity, because of human experimentation, cold blooded murder and genocide.

The webpage states that "the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials quoted Holmes's words in their own defense." This Holmes, spoken of here, is Wendell Holmes: a former U.S. Supreme Court Justice. Yes, the fundamental concepts of the murderous Nazis, the platform of the eugenicists, were upheld by members of the highest court in the United States.

It should be noted that after the Nuremberg Trials, the eugenics movement in the United States was outlawed as a crime against humanity. But, the eugenics movement did not simply go away. They just changed their name and continued in operation.

Quite a number of people in positions of power and control in the United States were, and are, full supporters of the eugenics movement and its causes.


Back to the Wanapum

It is time to consider, once again, the plight of the Wanapum People. To begin this examination, let us remember that the diet of the Wanapum relied heavily on fish from the Columbia River.

The core group of the Wanapum People lived at the lower end of Priest Rapids, on the Columbia River. Priest Rapids is located about 10 miles upstream from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

About 20 miles upstream from Hanford, or about 10 miles upstream from where the Wanapum were located at Priest Rapids, is an area where high radiation is noted along the Columbia River.

These bits of information relating to the Wanapum People bring up the questions presented in the following section.





American Genocide ?

Were radioactive materials from Hanford Nuclear Reservation intentionally dumped in the Columbia River about 10 miles upstream from the home of the Wanapum People?

Were radioactive materials intentionally dumped into the river to contaminate the fishing grounds of the Wanapum?

Were these radioactive materials dumped in the river as a human radiation experiment upon the Wanapum People, without their knowledge or consent?

Was this dumping of radioactive materials upstream of the Wanapum village another vile experiment orchestrated by people embracing the eugenics movement and Nazi thought?

Was this an experiment by eugenicists to watch the effects of internalized radiation, or already knowing knowing the ultimate effects, to do it anyway?

Has this radiation from the river and fish had a detrimental affect upon the Wanapum People?

Were the radioactive materials dumped in the Columbia River an attempt at American Genocide?

Who is responsible for the dumping of radioactive materials in the Columbia River, or is that Classified?

Is this the mentality displayed by those in control of the nuclear industry? Is this the mentality displayed by a large controlling faction in this country?





Food for Thought

There are many things relating to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation which cause a person to question what has really happened in the past.

There are many things happening now at Hanford which could readily cause a person to question those things which are happening today.

Yes, there is a hellacious mess at Hanford. But, what is really being done with it and for what reason?





Related Info

The page linked below presents information relating to contamination of the Hanford site. It declares: "In the 40's and 50's, some 440 billion gallons of contaminated liquids were discharged into the ground at Hanford, enough to create an 80 foot deep lake the size of Manhattan."



The link above shows that, initially, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) had a contract with British Nuclear Fuels Limited, Inc.(BNFL) for the conversion of nuclear waste into glass, via the vitrification plant.

The webpage indicates that BNFL was a "shady" company, both in this country and in England. Why the DOE would chose such a company is rather questionable.


Population Control ?

There are some very important issues to note in the link above.

Issue 1: "Government secrecy has barred Hanford workers and residents alike from access to the real facts..." "Until recently, all concerns from citizen groups have been consistently discredited and side-lined."

Issue 2: It was found that "increasing exposure to ionizing radiation boosts the risk of multiple myeloma, a rare but often fatal cancer of blood-forming tissues. Especially at risk are people exposed later in life."

It appears that certain groups could readily use ionizing radiation in the environment as a subtle, unseen form of euthenasia or large scale genocide experiment. Ionizing radiation in the environment could help to decimate the aged and the weak. This may fit perfectly into the goals of the diabolic eugenics movement.





Spent Fuel

The webpage linked below declares: "The reactors made plutonium by bombarding special fuel rods containing uranium with neutrons. Once the maximum amount of plutonium was produced, workers removed the fuel rods (now called 'spent fuel') from the reactor. The spent fuel rods were extremely radioactive..."



A "spent" fuel rod is not spent, in the sense of being used up. A "spent" fuel rod is one in which "the maximum amount of plutonium was produced."

In other words, a "spent" fuel rod is one that can produce the most plutonium for use in nuclear weapon or bomb making.

This puts a whole different perspective on the term "spent fuel rod." No wonder these rods are more highly radioactive after they come out of the reactor than when they were first put in.

Regarding rods or "slugs" which fuel nuclear reactors, the webpage linked below declares: "The slugs were only slightly radioactive before irradiation, making them easy to handle and transport. After irradiation, their radioactivity levels had increased several millions times making them very dangerous to handle."







Stored Rods

Some countries which use nuclear power do reprocess their "spent" fuel rods to reduce the amount of nuclear waste lying around. But others, like the United States, do not.

Is there a reason for this not wanting to reprocess the fuel rods in the United States and certain other countries?

The article linked below brings up some interesting points. It indicates that the nuclear industry and its research is sponsored by the "military-industrial complexes." And for what reason? To make nuclear weapons and bombs.



Let us consider this matter further. "Spent" fuel rods contain the largest amount of plutonium. Therefore, "spent" fuel rods are like having potential nuclear bombs lying around, rather than having the actual physical nuclear bombs.

At a moments notice, the fuel rods could start to be made into the actual, physical nuclear bombs. The "spent" fuel rods are nuclear bomb and weapon resources.

That may be why certain countries do not want to reprocess their "spent" fuel rods. In reprocessing, they may lose a lot of their nuclear weapon and bomb potential.

It's basically that simple. It's called, "being ready for Armageddon:" the final war which ends all wars, plus virtually all of civilization, too.





During World War II

When Hanford Nuclear Reservation was part of the bomb making business, during World War Two and the Cold War era, there were not "spent" fuel rods lying around for years.

The fuel rods were processed in a rather short period of time in order to extract the plutonium for bomb making, as noted in this link.

During normal wartime production, the fuel from the reactor was allowed to cool for about 30 days before processing, as shown in this link. During the Green Run, fuel was cooled for only 16 days.

When the Hanford site was found to be highly contaminated with radioactive iodine, the cooling period for the fuel was extended to about 60 days before processing. In 1948 and 1949, the fuel cooling time was extended to between 90 and 120 days. In 1950, the cooling time was shortened to 43 days.

The U.S. DOE speaks further about the processing of fuel rods in this link.





Depleted Uranium

We hear a lot about the use of depleted uranium in military weapons. What is the difference between enriched uranium and depleted uranium?

The different is in the amount of U-235 in the uranium sample.

If there is more than 0.7% of U-235 in the uranium sample, it is classed as enriched.

If there is less than 0.7% of U-235 in the sample, it is classed as depleted.

A sample of depleted uranium will still contain a large percentage of radioactive U-238.





DU & HEALTH

This section addresses a few of the health effects of depleted uranium (DU).

The link below is to a page by the University at Albany. It states many negative or devastating health effects produced by DU.

The page declares: "DU is primarily hazardous to people when it gets inside the body through ingestion, inhalation or through breaks in the skin."







Depleted Dust

The videos linked below speak about the effects of depleted uranium dust.



There are also a number of other videos on YouTube which present the detrimental effects of DU.

The page linked below is by Dr. Alan Cantwell. It speaks of a possible connection between depleted uranium, diabetes and cancer.







DU Weapons

The links below present a considerable amount of information about depleted uranium weapons.

It is of note that governments of today commonly deny using DU weapons because of health concerns by the public.

The links speak about the detrimental effects when DU gets inside the human body.

The first two links are YouTube videos.



The page linked below states: "The Pentagon contends that not one American veteran is ill because of DU exposure."

Now to cut through the double speak.

Not one, but it appears that multiple thousands of American veterans are ill because of DU exposure.



Why is the military using a weapon which is causing serious problems for our own service people, or is it intended to be that way?

Is there any chance that those who are adhering to eugenics thought are behind the use of these weapons?

It should be noted that the eugenics movement has never lost a war, no matter which side wins.





GW Syndrome

The page linked below presents information about Gulf War Syndrome (GWS). The page also speaks of the previous military use of Agent Orange.

It states: "Unfortunately, the U.S. military denied the problem..." This seems to be a bad habit of the military and other government agencies.

A lengthy video on the page linked below gives a presentation on GWS.







Fukushima

It is time to examine other practices being used upon our service personnel. It is time to begin questioning what is going on.

At Fukushima, everyone knew that the nuclear plants were spewing radioactive materials into the environment.

Nevertheless, the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan slides right into the middle of the radioactive stew.

The carrier's crew was exposed to high levels of radiation. Many are experiencing serious health problems.

The links below give many details.



Unfortunately, it appears that the Navy is "stonewalling" the victims. Why?

Those in charge should have known better. The military is not new to nuclear radiation. They have been intimately working with it since World War Two.

Was this an accident or was this done intentionally as just another form of human radiation experiment?





Experiments

The page linked below lists classified and unclassified U.S. government documents regarding human radiation experiments.

These experiments were performed by U.S. government agencies or other organizations associated with them.

The document linked below is a faster loading HTML version of the original PDF file linked here.



In the article below, it appears the government has low consideration for the "downwinders" of its experiments.

Those exposed to radiation were considered as "a low use segment of the population." Unless you are one of the elite, this appears to be how you are viewed.



Research indicates that the more hideous and vile the experiment, the more chance that its documentation will remain classified.

It is very easy to put the "classified" stamp on outright crimes against humanity. Possibly Hitler ultimately won the war, thanks to the eugenics movement which is alive and well in the United States.





On The Public ?

Scroll down to the bottom of page 11 (big page number), in the link below. Here you will find the following under the heading "The CIA & Department of Defense Attack Americans with Biological Weapons":

"...Families arriving or leaving Washington's National Airport and the main bus station of our Nation's capital, were sprayed with biological agents via specially equipped suitcases."

It also states, on page 6: "The United States government also authorized the American Energy Commission [which ultimately became the U.S. DOE, yes, the ones running Handford Nuclear Reservation] to secretly inject hospitalized patients with plutonium in order to profile the long term effects. Most of these individuals became terminally ill and died."

The link below is worth reading. But be forwarned: the atrocities may turn your stomach.



The video linked below exposes secret military testing and human experimentation done during the 1950s and 1960s. This unscrupulous testing caused an unsuspecting public in Saint Louis and other U.S. cities to breath radioactive materials.



Turning to other matters, the link below is about CIA drug smuggling into the United States. This was in the 1980s. But, are things any different today?



A little research can turn up much more information about government involvement in bringing illicit drugs into the country for sale to Americans.

What is presented here is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. More information can be found in the lower portion of the webpage linked below.



What is going on here? Are those in charge working to destroy our nation and decimate our populace?





Guidestones

Let us consider a strange and somewhat controversial monument in the United States. The Georgia Guidestones may point us toward the truth about what is happening in our country and the world. So may also the agenda of the powerful eugenics movement.

Below is a link to an introduction about the large Georgia Guidestones. The creation of the guidestones began in 1979. The opening of the finished monument was in 1980.



It is obvious that some very well financed organization spent a considerable amount of money to engrave the following message in stone: "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000..."

For a moment, let us think about the statement noted above. Do you understand the implications of this statement?

The current population of the earth (as of April 4, 2014) is about 7.25 billion people. The declaration on the Georgia Guidestones means dropping the population of this earth to less than 7 percent of its current value.

It appears, historically, that there has been an organized faction of well-financed people who have been calling for the elimination of a large portion of the people on this earth. In recent history, they have commonly been called the eugenics movement. Historically, they have often changed their name, or their public face, but their agenda has always remained the same. Their agenda is "getting rid of people that are not like us."

Now, how do the eugenicists plan on accomplishing the extreme reduction in the population of the earth to 500,000,000 people of less? By what methods do they intend to drop the population of the earth to less than 7 percent of its current value? Adolf Hitler and the Nazi eugenicists had their methods, but those methods are much too obvious and somewhat outdated. Does subtle and silent radiation, with its detrimental effects, fit nicely into the modern picture?

It is shown in this link (about the 6th paragraph from the top) that in the early 1900s, members of the well-financed American eugenics movement "carefully plotted the removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples," not in some other country, but right here in the United States. Euthanasia and eugenicide were considered for accomplishing this. Once again, it should be noted that the powerful American eugenics movement inspired the extermination camps of Nazi Germany.

After World War Two, the U.S. eugenics movement was outlawed because of its ethnic cleansing practices and crimes against humanity. But, the American eugenics movement did not simply go away. It just went underground and changed its public name or names and its public face.

It should be noted that in Nazi Germany and in the United States, the medical establishment helped further the cause of the organized and well-financed eugenics movement.





Thank You

The author thanks you for your support of this site. He works hard to bring you what he believes is the best "food for thought."

The author intends to update and improve the reports in this site, as he has the time and money available.

Again, thank you for your support.










Nuclear Power

Nuclear reactors came into existence for the purpose of making radioactive materials for bombs. Later, as an apparent afterthought, nuclear power plants were said to be used for civilian electrical power production. But, in all reality, it appears these nuclear power plants are basically military facilities staffed by civilians.

The nuclear disaster at Fukushima, Japan has possibly "opened up a can of worms." When the tsunami came into the nuclear facility, it was said that it wiped out the electrical power sources which could operate the cooling pumps for the reactor core. Hence, the meltdowns occurred in three reactors. This does raise some questions.

It is said that nuclear facilities are producing power for the electrical grid. If this is true, should not they be making more than enough power from the on-site turbine operated generators to fulfill all the electrical needs of the whole nuclear facility?

Should not the on-site generators be producing more than enough electricity, via nuclear power, to be able to power the cooling pumps for the nuclear reactor? Why, then, do nuclear power plants depend on outside power to operate their cooling pumps? What is going on here?

When considering nuclear power plants, some things are just not adding up. It would be interesting to run some tests on the electrical power lines going into nuclear power plants. It would be interesting to find out in which direction was the actual load on the power lines, and in which direction was the generator that is connected to the line.

If tests were performed, would we find that these large nuclear power plants are actually drawing a whole lot of power out of the electrical grid? Could they, instead of producing a large amount of civilian electrical power, simply be a manufacturing facility for weapons grade, nuclear bomb and military materials?

Is anyone reading this report skilled in performing the necessary electrical tests, to find direction of load on an AC electrical line? Are you up for a potentially revealing investigation? It is time to find out the truth about nuclear facilities.





Hanford Issues

It is time to turn our attention to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and the radioactively contaminated aquifer beneath it.

Let us examine, in the next section, how this contamination got into the aquifer in the first place.





Hanford Waste

The webpage linked below is called "A Short History of Hanford Waste Generation, Storage, and Release."

On Adobe Reader, page 12 of 39, is found the following:

"During the first months of waste generation and release, mildly contaminated liquids were simply discharged to a low spot on the ground (Brown and Ruppert 1950)."

"Most liquids seeped into the sandy soil, adding contaminants to the soil, deep sediment, and groundwater."

"Some liquids evaporated, leaving surface residues for plant and animal uptake as well as being dispersed by the wind. This disposal practice created contaminated wetlands."

"These practices quickly became unacceptable. Liquids were then pumped down wells. While this got contaminants underground, it also injected them closer to, and sometimes into the underlying aquifer."

"Within months, well use was discontinued except for the disposal of small waste quantities (Du Pont 1945)."







Soil and River

The document linked below is called "The Hanford Nuclear Waste Site: A Legacy of Risk, Cost, and Inefficiency." On Adobe Reader, page 1 of 31, is declared the following:

"With limited knowledge of the dangers associated with radioactive waste, DOE officials at Hanford disposed of millions of gallons of highly radioactive materials directly into the soil."

"Today, large quantities of these radioactive substances have been detected in the ground water beneath the site, contaminating the water that feeds the Columbia River."

Adobe Reader, page 3 of 31, declares the following:

"During the course of the Hanford site's nearly 50 years of production, separation, and purification of plutonium for the nation's nuclear weapons, the DOE estimates that the Hanford site produced approximately 450 billion gallons of liquid waste."

"The vast majority of this waste - estimated to be as much as 350 million gallons - was released directly into the ground (in the 200 Areas) through about 300 cribs, ponds, and unlined trenches, while liquid wastes of varying levels of contamination were often pumped directly into the Columbia River."



The document above, on Adobe Reader, page 5 of 31, also states that the wastes are "contaminating the ground water that feeds into the Columbia River."

The next bit of information is important. These wastes going into the river include: "chromium, nitrates, trichloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, tritium, technetium-99, uranium, and strontium-90, some of which can remain radioactive for hundreds of thousands of years."





Bomb Materials

The article from the section above, linked here, declares the following on Adobe Reader, page 5 of 31:

"Another primary challenge for the DOE is the approximately 12 tons of plutonium in various separated forms contained in spent nuclear fuel at the K-Reactor Basins (K-Basins)."





By the River

The DOE webpage, linked here, shows that the location for the contaminated and leaking K-Basins is "about 400 yards from the Columbia River."

The K-Basins are located "adjacent to the K-East and K-West Reactors" The map, linked here, shows the K-East and K-West Reactors by the Columbia River, in the upper portion of the map.

The picture, linked here, is looking generally south toward the K-East and K-West Reactors, viewed from above the river. The K-Basins are the long, narrow pools behind (to the south of) the reactor buildings.

The picture, linked here, is looking generally north. Note that the area of the KW-Basin has been filled in.

"About 400 yards" is not very far from the river. The K-Basins were leaking radioactive materials into the ground (and ultimately into the Columbia River).

The DOE page states that crews moved the irradiated fuel rods from the K-Basins to the Canister Storage Building, by 2004.

Unfortunately, the radioactive sludge still exists, plus there is a considerable amount of contaminated ground and groundwater. This contamination ends up in the Columbia River.





Flow Rate

The map, linked here, indicates that the aquifer system beneath Hanford moves its water (which should include a portion of the contamination in it) at a rate of 100 to 2,000 feet per day.

Using the flow rates above, and under the right conditions, how fast could a portion of the radioactive waste from the leaking K-Basins travel the 400 yards to reach the river, once it reached groundwater?

Let us remember that the leaking K-Basins are relatively near the river, compared to other dumping areas which were more toward the center of the site and miles from the river.





From the USGS

The article linked below states: "In 1986, the U.S. Geological Survey estimated that ground water probably moves the 7 to 9 miles from the main dumping grounds to the Columbia River in 10 to 20 years. But it could travel the distance in as little as six years under some conditions."







Real Life

It is time to put all the estimates aside and look at a real life, bonafide experience.

The webpage linked below contains some very revealing information on Adobe Reader, page 18 of 159.

Shortly after plutonium processing began at Hanford in 1945, wells at the Hanford site "were contaminated with uranium and it had spread offsite to wells at Benton City by mid 1947."

In about 2-1/2 years, the uranium wastes traveled about 20 miles to the Benton City wells.



It appears that government estimates for rate of groundwater travel in the Hanford region are highly inaccurate.

It did not take the uranium 10 to 15 years, or more, to travel about 20 miles to the wells for Benton City.

Again, it was done in only about 2-1/2 years. This lends credibility to the map, linked here, which shows a flow rate for the aquifer of about 100 to 2,000 feet per day in this region.





Rate of Movement

Plutonium is heavier than uranium and may be moved along more slowly by the water in the aquifer.

Uranium moved 20 miles in the aquifer below the Hanford region in 2-1/2 years, to get into the Benton City wells.

Benton City is about 8 miles from the southern borders of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

If the plutonium was still on the Hanford site at 2-1/2 years, it was moving slower than the uranium.

But, by now, the plutonium which was injected into the aquifer at Hanford in the mid 1940s is most likely dozens of miles outside of the Hanford boundaries, possibly having spread out in many directions.





NOTE:
Overflow created by upgrades to information in this column is moved and integrated into information in right margin.
Information is not simply deleted from this column.

Sakrisson Energy Solutions David Sakrisson Observing Problems  ...  Researching  ...  Presenting the Facts

Working for the Benefit of Humanity   ...   Rather than the "Special Interests"

A spike in serious birth defects in region surrounding the Hanford Nuclear Reservation?  What is going on here?  That, and much more...


The  Hanford  Nuclear  Report



An  Introduction

A documented report by:  David E. Sakrisson
Independent Researcher and Investigative Reporter

Copyright © 2011-2018  by  David E. Sakrisson
All Rights Reserved

Last addition to this Webpage:
Monday, April 28, 2014  (12:55pm)




************************
2018 NOTE:

Because of changes on the Internet, many links within this report no longer work. Because of size restrictions on this server, updated and greatly expanded editions of this Hanford Nuclear Report have been set up on other servers. The updated and expanded editions are now more than four times larger than the report you are now reading. At the new locations, the expanded reports have much new material added, including info about how radioactive contamination is escaping from Hanford. The locations of the updated and expanded reports are:
http://www.cascadian.orgfree.com/hanrep.htm  and  http://cascadian.1apps.com


************************


THE UPDATED AND EXPANDED REPORTS

Reports on the two servers linked above contain information about north-south aligned fault systems which appear to readily aid radioactive wastes from Hanford in their travel southward, toward and into the Yakima River. Interestingly enough, for some reason, these north-south aligned fault systems --- which apparently help wisk radioactive wastes from Hanford southward to the Yakima River and beyond --- do not show up on most maps of the Hanford region. There are only certain reputable sources which show these faults (link).

The expanded reports also contain information about the buried bed of the ancestral Columbia River, which resides beneath the Hanford Nuclear Reservation (link). This buried riverbed appears to act like an extremely large "French Drain."(link) It appears that this giant "French Drain" allows radioactive contaminants from Hanford to readily flow southward into the Yakima River. That is possibly why the quality of the water in the Yakima River seriously degrades downstream from Prosser, Washington. That is possibly also why the Yakima River dumps so much uranium into the Columbia River --- much more than the other sources in the region (link).

The expanded reports give evidence as to why radioactive and chemical wastes from Hanford were intentionally dumped into the ground and forcibly pumped into the groundwater and regional aquifer system beneath Hanford. These acts worked to contaminate and poison these important resources, from which come irrigation and drinking water in the region. As a side note, it appears that President John F. Kennedy, in the early 1960s, began to realize at least part of what was happening in our world and country. He spoke about a "monolithic and ruthless conspiracy"(1)(2)(3) and a "plot to enslave every man, woman, and child." It appears that the conspirators did not want Kennedy's subtle warnings to awaken the general public in the United States, so they had to ruthlessly get rid of Kennedy in 1963.

The updated reports give evidence which indicates that organizations in control of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, when the radioactive and chemical wastes were dumped into the ground and forcibly pumped groundwater and regional aquifer system, were acting as agents of a foreign power. These organizations in control of Hanford had ties to and were supporting the international eugenics movement, which wants to destroy 90-percent of the earth's population (1)(2). The controllers of Hanford were also treasonously supporting Adolph Hilter and the Nazis before and during the World War Two era (1)(2). And, Hilter and the Nazis, in turn, had a Concordat with the Vatican (link) and appear to have been on a "holy war" for the Vatican/Jesuit organization.

Research indicates that Hilter and the Nazis, plus the other Axis Powers, were working to bring about that one-world-government which in the early 1800s had been called "The Empire of the World."(link) They were simply working as "the sword of the Catholic Church" (link) to bring about that one-world-government which in our day is known as the papal and Jesuit controlled New World Order, which is simply the modern version of the old Holy Roman Empire. The controllers of Hanford, who supported Hitler and the Nazis, plus the New World Order, appear to have worked to poison the groundwater and regional aquifer system at Hanford for their foreign masters. This poisoning of groundwater and aquifers has also occurred at other nuclear facilities around the country. These issues, plus a lot more, are examined in the updated and expanded reports.



Pick on any links below to obtain further information on a subject.




WHAT  ABOUT  HANFORD ?

It is time to ask a few questions, for our own good and for the good of our country. Why have there been so many problems with the "cleanup" effort at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington State? What is happening with the vitrification plant which is supposed to help clean up the radioactive mess at that site? Is this vitrification plant based on a substandard design, which could allow for explosions and uncontrolled nuclear chain reactions?

Could a serious accident at the vitrification plant (if it ever does become operational) present the potential for a serious spread of harmful ionizing radiation? Are there geologic faults in this region, which could allow for a serious earthquake? Could a serious earthquake result in a catastrophic release of ionizing radiation from this facility? Why have there been allegations that the U.S. Department of Energy is greatly mismanaging the Hanford project?

Is there a major, multi-state aquifer system in this region which is getting, or has already been, highly contaminated with radioactive waste from the Hanford site? Are there radioactive contaminants in the water which is used to irrigate crops in this region? Does radioactivity in crops get internalized by those who eat them? Does radiation get into the feed for farm animals? Does radiation become internalized by those who eat contaminated animals?

Can radioactive materials in the regional aquifer system create health problems in susceptible people who commonly drink this water? In recent times, has there been a major increase in serious birth defects in the region surrounding the Hanford Nuclear Reservation? Could this have anything to do with radioactive emissions in the air and contaminants in the regional aquifer system from which drinking and irrigation water comes?

Has there been a general denial, by various government agencies, about the detrimental effects of internalized ionizing radiation? Has there been a general denial, by various agencies, regarding the detrimental effects of chronic low-dose exposure to ionizing radiation? Do those in control of the government have a history of "stiff arming" and basically "giving the middle finger" to citizens they have greatly harmed with their ionizing radiation?

These issues, plus many more, are examined in this broad-spectrum report. The eugenics movement, and how it relates to those things happening in our country and our world, is also considered. This is a documented report, with numerous links. The blunt facts are presented. The rest is up to you.




WILL  OF  THE  PEOPLE

Many people in the state of Washington have not approved (nor approve at this time) of those things which are going on at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. As a result, the voters in Washington placed Initiative 297 (I-297) on the ballot in November of 2004. The purpose of I-297 was to bar outside shipments of radioactive waste to an already, highly contaminated Hanford Nuclear Reservation, which was and is supposed to be in "cleanup" mode.

I-297 passed by an overwhelming margin. The people of Washington had clearly spoken their minds. They did not want (and still do not want) the nation's dangerous, radioactive waste dump in their midst. Nevertheless, a federal judge blocked the application of I-297, until further arguments could be heard in the courts. In 2006, a federal judge overturned I-297, calling it unconstitutional. This was all done in violation of the expressed will of the people.




AN  OBSERVATION

Let us take a closer look at what the federal judge did in 2006, regarding I-297. That judge struck down the expressed will of the people, declaring their legitimate will as being something which was unconstitutional. The author has researched the U.S. Constitution over the years and has read the writings of those involved with the implementation of that document. Therefore, the author must speak his mind, and let the pieces fall where they may.

From his research, the author does not believe that the writers and signers of the Constitution of the United States of America intended, in any way, for that document to be used as a tool to crush or disregard the expressed will of the people. The Constitution was not meant to be distorted and used as a tool, by an elite group, to enslave the general public under the dominance of an elite, despotic group or its agendas.

It appears that the writers and signers of the U.S. Constitution meant for that document to be used as a special tool, to help protect a free people from an errant or despotic government. The proper use of that document would help prevent a government, or the people who may have illegitimately taken control of it, from running amuck and "going rogue." The intended purpose of the Constitution is to help prevent a government from trampling on the express will of the people, as it did in the case of I-297.

It appears that the true purpose of the Constitution is to help prevent a government from becoming abusive or despotic. It was also meant to help stop any particular group from "hijacking" the reigns of power in the United States and bringing the country down an improper road. The proper use of the Constitution would also help prevent genocide in the United States, no matter what "cloak" is used to cover this genocide.




THE  EXPENDABLES

It is time to consider the mentality of those in control of the nuclear industry, plus those who have taken over the government and brought it down a road which is becoming highly questionable. The articles linked below tend to show a very calloused U.S. Government which considers the "downwinders" harmed by its nuclear experiments simply as being a "low-use segment of the population."

It appears we are dealing with a rogue government which has no conscience. Citizens it wilfully harms are not of any value to it. They are simply the expendables. Their purpose is to allow the elite to survive. Because this eugenicist government appears to have no respect for life, citizens can simply be harmed by radiation by the government's irresponsible and premeditated acts. It is time for citizens to realize those who are the true terrorists of our world.

The links below present government atrocities and general human experimentation with ionizing radiation. The first link comes to us from the State of Utah. Others come to us from the National Geographic Magazine, plus the states of Idaho, Nevada and Washington. In the links below, we are basically reading and hearing about premeditated, extremely brazen American genocide.






The vile thinking and despotic acts shown above, which are brazenly displayed by the government and the nuclear industry, should be classed as criminal. Yes, they are crimes against humanity. These acts appear to stem from the concepts of the eugenics movement, whose supporters appear to have hijacked our government. This is the same movement whose thoughts inspired the atrocities of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis during the World War Two era.

The eugenics movement was outlawed in the United States after World War Two, because of the atrocities so brazenly displayed by their Nazis collaborators. Unfortunately, the eugenics movement went "underground" and we are dealing with this "criminally-minded group" today in many facets of our daily lives. Once this is understood, everything happening at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, plus elsewhere in our world, makes perfect sense.




ONGOING  DECEPTION ?

Declassified government documents and other reports indicate that the general public was consistently deceived and willfully lied to by Hanford officials and the government during the plutonium production years at Hanford. The public was consistently lied to about the amount of radioactive waste getting into the air, the regional aquifer and the Columbia River, plus the health hazards presented by this waste. The public was also continually kept in the dark about the high level of radiation getting into the food chain, which became internalized in their bodies.

Scientists associated with Hanford performed numerous studies to find the degree of radiation getting into the river and the regional food chain. A number of Hanford scientists were highly concerned about the high level of radiation being presented to the public. But the story consistently presented to the public by Hanford officials and the government was completely different. The public was told that all is well with Hanford and there is nothing to be concerned about. Is it any different today?

As one small example of government deception in relatively recent times, the U.S. Department of Energy has blatantly deceived "a government-chartered advisory panel" regarding the nature of the material leaking in the storage tank area for high-level radioactive waste. This deception and lying is clearly shown in the article linked below.



The webpage linked below reveals other deceptive practices by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE intends to reclassify high-level nuclear waste at Hanford as being low-level nuclear waste, so the DOE does not have to do a true cleanup at Hanford. Yes, Hanford is the DOE eugenicist's dream come true.



It is now time to take a closer look at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: the Pandora's Box presented to the citizens of the United States (and possibly even Canada) by the U.S. Department of Energy and its confederates.





A  World-Class  "Dirty  Bomb" ?
Hanford nuclear waste, geologic and eugenics issues which affect the whole Pacific Northwest


A documented report by:  David E. Sakrisson
Independent Researcher and Investigative Reporter

Copyright © 2011-2018  by  David E. Sakrisson
All Rights Reserved



Pick on any links below to obtain further information on a subject.




THE  NATIONAL  RADIOACTIVE  AND  CHEMICAL  WASTE  DUMP

The Hanford Nuclear Reservation is one of the worst environmental disasters in the world. It presents the citizens of the United States, and possibly even Canada, with an immense safety and health hazard. The potential for an accident is always present here. A serious fire or nuclear accident at this site could have its radioactive contaminants spread over a vast area via the wind, rain and Columbia River. Nevertheless, the Obama administration and the U.S. Department of Energy appears determined to use the Hanford Nuclear Reservation as a national nuclear junkyard.

The webpage linked below, from December 13, 2013, declares: "The U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) will issue a formal 'Record of Decision' in the Federal Register on Friday, December 13th stating that USDOE will plan to resume using Hanford as a national radioactive and chemical waste dump for waste from other USDOE weapons and nuclear facilities."



The webpage linked below presents more information regarding the "unveiling" of the true intent and purpose for the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.



A question should be considered at this point, that we may better understand the nature of those in control at Hanford. Is it any coincidence that the U.S. Department of Energy chose to issue their formal statement on Friday the 13th? Possibly their choice is more ominous than we realize, especially once all the information on this page is considered. It is important to note the increasing birth defects in this region. It is also important to note the geologic hazards which are present beneath, or very near to the Hanford site.




INCREASED  RADIATION  RISK

As the northwest nuclear junkyard, or actually the nation's main nuclear junkyard, radioactive waste from around the nation will be shipped to the Hanford site. Actually, there is a considerable amount of radioactive waste from around the nation which does get shipped to Hanford. It appears that there is even high-level waste which has come in these shipments, without the public ever knowing about it until much later. The next entry is just one example.

The webpage linked below speaks about the USS Ronald Reagan and its irradiation in 2011, during the early stages of the ongoing Fukushima, Japan, nuclear disaster. The webpage also speaks of secret Navy shipments of radioactive waste to Hanford. It speaks about the reactor cores from 117 decommissioned submarines which are at Hanford. These cores are sealed with steel plates and then left uncovered and fully exposed, plus virtually unprotected from the outside world. This picture and this and this gives some scale to the size of these reactors.

The page linked below also presents information about potential radiation releases which are happening at Hanford, plus the Pasco Aquifer which is located directly beneath this highly contaminated nuclear site. There is much more to the aquifer story than simply the Pasco Aquifer. A more complete story about the major, endangered, multi-level regional aquifer system is presented further down on this page which you are currently reading.



The webpage linked below is another example of radioactive shipments to Hanford. It declares: "In addition, DOE transported two shipments of remotely-handled TRU [transuranic] waste in 2002 from the Energy Technology and Engineering Center (ETEC) in southern California to Hanford, Washington..." As this link states, remote-handled TRU "can be highly radioactive."





HOTTER  THAN  HIGH-LEVEL

The article linked below declares: "On Dec. 20, [2002] the first shipment of plutonium-laden transuranic wastes arrived at Hanford for indefinite storage. These shipments are as hot as -- or hotter than -- high-level nuclear waste and are mixed with an uncharacterized array of hazardous and toxic chemical wastes." The article states:"The transuranic wastes coming to Hanford are so hot they have to be handled remotely."

These extremely radioactive and dangerous transuranic (TRU), plutonium-laden wastes were "generated at an Ohio nuclear weapons and fuel development laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy." These deadly TRU wastes are being added "to an already-contaminated Hanford site." So, what is this ruse about cleaning up Hanford, when even more high-level TRU waste has actually been dumped there?

It appears that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has illegally sent high-level radioactive, plutonium-laden TRU waste materials to Hanford over quite a period of time. This appears to be a criminally dangerous act by the DOE, which apparently does not care about the health and safety of the general populace in the region, nor about the extremely important regional aquifer system or the Columbia River.





EXTREME  CONTAMINATION

The PDF document linked below (on Adobe Reader, page 5 of 8) declares: "Most of the waste from the nation's nuclear weapons production is at Hanford, including more than 80 percent of its highly radioactive spent reactor fuel, almost 60 percent of its high-level radioactive wastes, more than half of its buried "transuranic" wastes (elements heavier than uranium), and the largest amount of contaminated soil and groundwater."



Without adding any further nuclear waste, the Hanford site is already the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States. It is the most contaminated site in the western hemisphere. It is the most contaminated site on this earth, outside of Russia. This information is found in the webpages linked below.



To make matters worse for the citizens of the Pacific Northwest, the extremely contaminated Hanford National Radioactive and Chemical Waste Dump has the Columbia River winding through its property, plus a very important, multi-state aquifer system beneath its surface. It appears the new mandate for Hanford is to simply cover-up, not truly clean up. But there is more to this story, actually a whole lot more.




THE  JEOPARDOUS  ONE-PERCENT

At a quick glance, the title on the link below sounds very good. It indicates that the Feds are going to retrieve nearly all the radioactive waste in Hanford's 177 underground tanks. The article states that the government "intends to retrieve 99 percent of the stored waste and close up the tanks." It sounds like the danger from Hanford will be drastically reduced. It sounds like we may now have nothing to worry about from Hanford. Wrong! So horribly wrong!



In the 177 underground storage tanks at Hanford is said to be at least 53 million gallons of extremely hazardous, radioactive sludge. It is said to be some of the most dangerous stuff on earth. It is said that ninety-nine percent of this material will be removed. This means that at least one-percent will remain in the tanks.

It is time to do some simple math. One-percent of 53 million gallons means that 530,000 gallons of deadly brew will be left in the ground. To give some perspective to this situation, how many 55-gallon drums would be filled with this 530,000 gallons of deadly material? The answer is: 9,636 drums. But, this is not the end of the story.




EXAMINING  THE  ONE-PERCENT

It is time to consider just a small part of the hazardous material that the government intends to leave in the ground, after the so-called "cleanup" is "finished." What will be the major ingredients in that one-percent that is left in the 177 underground storage tanks? To come to a better understanding of this matter, it is important for us to first find out if this one-percent is measured by weight or by volume.

The document linked below, from the Federal Register Online, declares: "As stated in the Final TC&WM EIS, for the actions related to tank waste retrieval, treatment and closure, DOE prefers Tank Closure Alternative 2B, without removing technetium in the Pretreatment Facility. Tank Closure Alternative 2B includes 99 percent retrieval of waste by volume from the SSTs." SSTs are the 149 single-shell tanks. The 28 double-shell tanks [DSTs] are also mentioned in the document.



From the document linked above, it is clear that the 99-percent of hazardous waste removal from the underground storage tanks is by volume, not by weight. It is time to consider what this means.




SPECIFIC  GRAVITY  AND  DENSITY

Higher density materials, because of their higher specific gravity, tend to sink to the bottom of a slurry or sludge in a container. In the underground tanks for storage of radioactive waste at Hanford, the one-percent which remains in the tanks after "closure" will be composed of a concentration of the heaviest radioactive materials. This will include (with specific gravities noted) things like americium (13.67), uranium (18.8), plutonium (19.84), plus a variety of other radioactive materials.

Take a look at the 'Specific Gravity of Metals Table,' linked here. From the chart, it is clear that one cubic foot of uranium particles is almost 2-1/2 times heavier than the same amount of iron or steel particles. The same volume of plutonium particles would be slightly lighter in weight than the uranium particles.

Using the three materials noted above, in a slurry, the uranium particles would generally be at the bottom. On top of the uranium would be a layer of plutonium particles. The steel or iron would rest on top. If there were particles of lower density or lower specific gravity materials in the container, they would all be further up in the stack, in the order of their densities.




HANFORD  TANKS

Regarding the 177 underground storage tanks at Hanford, the upper 99 percent (by volume) which is to be removed in the "cleanup" effort will be the lighter weight, lower density elements or components in the sludge. This lighter, lower density portion includes virtually all the "easy-to-get" liquid in the tank. The one-percent that will be left in the bottom of the tanks will be the heaviest and densest mixture of the radioactive elements, plus a variety of other materials which will be created as the heavier materials decay.

The one-percent of the radioactive waste materials which would remain in the bottom of the tanks, which would be buried in the ground above the regional aquifer system, will be things like uranium, plutonium, neptunium and strontium, as shown in this 2010 document from the Yakama Nation (on Adobe Reader, page 58-59 of 72). So, effectively, we would still be left with a hellacious mess on our hands for ages to come.

In such a case, it is virtually a guarantee that the Columbia River will be permanently polluted or permanently destroyed with chemicals and radiation from the Hanford site.

Yes, there are actually many reasons for our friends in the Tri-Cities and the Columbia Basin of Washington state, plus all the Native American tribes in the region, to be utterly displeased. For one, it is said that they are some of the most irradiated people on this earth. But, there is more to this story. The evidence shows that radiation from Hanford went far beyond this region and negatively affected many other people, especially during the diabolical Green Run.




HEADING  FOR  THE  RIVER

Official reports state that one million gallons of highly radioactive waste at Hanford has leaked and is heading for the Columbia River. The report linked below states that "a 1998 study by Department of Energy scientists estimated the total leaks 6 times that amount." This means that 6 million gallons could be heading for the river, with a certain portion of it possibly already in the river. And, this is just the amount leaking from the area of the 177 underground tanks. This does not include the contamination from other buried sources of radioactive materials on this site.

Later in this report, we will examine the truth about what is already getting in the Columbia River, plus that which is getting into the Yakima River and the complex, multi-state regional aquifer system in the ground below.

The report linked below gives some other disturbing information. This information puts a whole different perspective on the Hanford "cleanup" project. There is a Vitrification Plant being built at Hanford. The stated purpose for that plant was to stabilize and make safe the radioactive waste at Hanford. But, it "will only be able to process a portion of the tank waste, at most. There is currently no plan for stabilizing the remaining tank waste."



So, in a "best case" scenario, we will still be left with a whole load of dangerous and deadly waste for our generation and future generations to deal with. Those contaminated plumes in the groundwater heading for the Columbia River will never be truly cleaned up, nor will the regional aquifer system. This, in itself, is a serious problem. But, the radioactive mess in the ground utterly pales in comparison to the full story of the world-class "dirty bomb" which appears is being prepared at Hanford.




POPULACE  IN  DANGER

This link, from the Department of Ecology, Washington State, declares that there is "more than a million people" located downstream of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. For this reason, there should be a strong sense of urgency in the cleanup at Hanford. Things should be done in a properly planned, properly organized and efficient manner, in order to get everything done as quickly and as safely as possible.

The 60 Minutes article linked below declares: "But for the Energy Department, which runs the project, it's been a case of easier said than done. In the nearly 16 years 60 Minutes has been covering this story, it's been one foul up after the next."



A person must truly ask, "What is the motivating reason behind all these foul ups?" Why are they not just "getting in there and getting the job done?" It is almost as if they don't care if the job ever gets done. Is there a hidden agenda in operation here?




FAST  TRACKING

The 2006 article linked below declares: "Bechtel's $4.3-billion, 11-year contract for design and construction has ballooned to $11 billion, with an additional six years." The article speaks of the DOE allowing Bechtel to "fast-track the project, with design, construction and technology development occurring simultaneously."

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) says, "This approach is not recommended for designing and constructing one-of-a-kind, complex, nuclear facilities." Why? The GAO declares that this "approach increases the risk of problems that can adversely affect cost and schedule."

The article gives an important piece of information. The GAO states: "DOE's history of using the design-build, fast track approach is replete with examples of failure." From the GAO's statements, it appears that the DOE does not learn from their mistakes. Yes, they definitely have a history.



For those desiring more insight into why the GAO has a problem with the DOE and what it is doing at Hanford, simply read one of their reports by clicking on the button below.



It appears that the DOE's fast-tracking has simply escalated costs and dangerously extended the timeline for the Hanford project. Because of the extreme seriousness of that which is being dealt with, and that which is facing the populace, time should be of the essence --- as should be proper planning and organization.




A  SCATHING  STATEMENT

The following linked information is from 2013. The report states that the GAO is called "the investigative arm of Congress." Regarding Hanford, the GAO declared: "The DOE is not in a position to manage the work of its contractors." The GAO "puts DOE on GAO's high risk list for those vulnerable to fraud, waste, abuse and mismanagement."

Yes, go back and re-read the preceeding sentence again. With that statement by the GAO, it appears that the DOE could be in a position for manipulation by an outside entity. Possibly they could do things outside of their legitimate and authorized purpose. Possibly they could also be willfully negligent of their lawful duty.



It appears that the DOE may be hiding the nasty truth about Hanford from the general public and possibly even from Congress. Possibly the DOE has been hiding the extreme seriousness of the environmental disaster created by Hanford. Possibly they have even been willfully hiding the seriousness and extent of the deadly hazard presented by this very contaminated nuclear site.

What could happen if a contractor for the DOE discovered the truth about Hanford and the full extent of the horrific mess which the DOE has made in this region. That contractor could potentially make the information available to the general public or to Congress. Possibly the DOE would not want something like that to happen.

Could the DOE keep feeding such a contractor a considerable amount of money for substandard work, just to keep them quiet? Could the DOE allow such a contractor to waste time on the project and not meet projected completion dates for vital systems, without any negative repercussions to the contractor? Could this situation cause the DOE to totally mismanage a cleanup project at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation?




THE  MEMO

The links below are from 2012. The first article declares that "the Energy Department released a statement expressing frustration with the progress of the [vitrification] plant." Was that statement made simply in an attempt to appease the public, or were they simply showing their own incompetence? What gives here. The DOE is supposed to be the ones in charge!

In his internal memo, the chief treatment plant engineer blasted what was going on at the vitrification plant and how things were being handled. But, it should be noted that this chief engineer ultimately went down the road. He no longer works for the DOE.



Gary Brunson was the chief engineer who is mentioned above. He was in a good position to see what was being built at the Hanford vitrification plant. He recognized that something was drastically wrong. Some of his concerns are noted in the lower half of the article linked below.

Mr. Brunson declared that Bechtel had "provided a design solution that was not technically defensible, technically viable, or was technically flawed."



Let us continue onward with this examination, that we may better understand what is wrong. But first, let us consider the serious mismanagement at this potentially dangerous nuclear facility.




HISTORY  OF  MISMANAGEMENT

The link below addresses mismanagement of the Hanford Vitrification Plant project, back in 2005. That's nine years ago (as of 2014). According to the report, "The situation has been out of control for some time, and the taxpayers are the ones flipping the bill." One problem has been "a lack of foresight to make the facilities earthquake-proof."

The report declares, "This is yet another justification of the public's fears that nuclear materials are being handled in an incompetent manner." More will be presented on this matter later.



Below is another article from 2005. Regarding the Vitrification Plant, it declares that "the Energy Department and Bechtel grossly underestimated how strong the plant must be to withstand severe earthquakes." But, it appears this drastic error is no big deal for Bechtel. Why? The article states: "This is a cost-plus-incentive-fee deal. The construction firm puts up no capital but is guaranteed at least something."

Let us now face the facts. That "something" has turned into a very large amount of money at this time. There is also something else to consider. If the plant later presents a serious radiation hazard to the general public, or catastrophically blows up, Bechtel may simply walk away with our money as their profits, thanks to the DOE.



We must truly ask why the DOE or Bechtel would allow such a thing to happen. Why would they "grossly underestimated how strong the plant must be to withstand severe earthquakes." One must ask if there is another agenda in operation here.




POLITICAL  AND  CORPORATE  CORRUPTION ?

It is time to consider things which may have an affect on the management of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Let us consider just a bit of the history of political and corporate corruption associated with this facility. There actually is quite a history of questionable activities relating to this facility and the cleanup program. The information which follows may be just the proverbial "tip of the iceberg."

The following news article is from October of 1997. It states: "A Senate committee is investigating the impact of political ties and campaign donations on the award of a $5 billion management contract at the Hanford nuclear reservation." It states further: "Federal Election Commission records show numerous contributions from department contractors to the Democratic National Committee, some made close to the time they landed big contracts."



The following article is from 2003. It comes to us from The Baltimore Chronicle. It appears there is political corruption involved with the mismanaged Hanford cleanup. The article heading states: "Influence-peddling was at the root of a near disaster at the Hanford nuclear plant in Washington State."



In the article below, Michael C. Ormsby, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Washington, declared: "The cleanup efforts at Hanford are too important to have prime contractors who misuse government funds to lobby for more government funds. We are pleased that Fluor has settled these allegations and hope that this serves as a reminder to all prime contractors at Hanford that they must be good stewards of tax payer dollars."



These words above sound good. But, what seems to be the trend at Hanford? It appears that government contractors are really "leveraging" the Hanford nuclear mess to their own benefit. On the other hand, it appears that government agencies are not working in the best interests of the taxpayer's and their money. It appears that certain groups of people may have lost their moral compass.



The link below is from December of 2013. The article states: "Consultants on the Hanford nuclear weapons site cleanup overbilled the federal government 'tens of millions of dollars,' then fired a paralegal who tried to report the fraud, the woman claims in Federal Court."



The article linked below begins with the following words: "On Friday, the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Washington filed a civil complaint under the False Claims Act alleging that Washington Closure Hanford LLC (WCH) and others falsely claimed credit for awarding tens of millions of dollars-worth of federal subcontracting business to small businesses including woman-owned small businesses."



It is time to make a very large understatement. It appears that Hanford is being used as a vehicle for corporate and government interests to literally rip off U.S. taxpayers. It also appears that there is gross mismanagement at the Hanford nuclear facility.




BECAUSE  OF  MISMANAGEMENT

The article linked below is from 1993. That's twenty-one years ago (as of 2014). The article declares that the Hanford cleanup "is failing because of mismanagement, erroneous information and a lack of commitment."



So, the mismanagement at Hanford has been going on for a very long time. But, why has this been allowed to happen? This is not the normal way projects or business should be run, nor is it the way government should be run.




HIGH-LEVEL  WARNINGS

Once again, Gary Brunson was the top official in the engineering department for the waste treatment plant (or Vitrification Plant) at Hanford. He raised many serious concerns about the design of this plant, but was basically ignored by the powers that be. Ultimately, he quit his job. The article linked below states: "Enough is wrong that someone like the director of the engineering is checking out."



What was it that Gary Brunson saw that made him feel the way he did? What was the picture which went through his mind as he envisioned the future of the Vitrification Plant? What made him quit and walk away from a prestigious and high paying job?




SAFETY  AT  HANFORD

It is time to consider the overall safety history of the Hanford cleanup project. The webpages linked below present disturbing information. They speak about toxic chemicals which are in the vapors emitted at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. They speak of "safety breakdowns" at the facility. They speak about key equipment being installed at the waste cleanup plant (the Vitrification plant) which presents horrific safety issues. It appears that all of this, and more, has and is being done with the blessing of the Energy Department (U.S. DOE). What is going on here?







DECEPTION,  COVER-UP  AND  LIES

Regarding the Hanford facility, it appears that widespread deception and cover-up has been the norm for quite some time. This deception and cover-up has readily allowed for unsafe equipment to be installed in a very critical nuclear processing plant.

It appears that deception is used to cover up instances of safety violations at the Hanford facility. Furthermore, it appears deception is possibly being used to cover up what may ultimately prove to be the true intent and purpose for the Hanford Vitrification Plant, as it is being constructed.






JUST  THE  "TIP  OF  THE  ICEBERG"

The webpages linked below give more pieces of the picture, that we may better understand what is truly happening at Hanford, plus the mentality that exists there. But one thing should be noted. What is presented by the news media and popular publications is often just a small part of the real story. Therefore, the reader is urged to do further research on these issues.

It is time for people to become informed, that they may see through the possible deception we are dealing with at the Hanford nuclear facility. It is also time to realize the magnitude of the hazard which is being presented to the general public by this extremely contaminated facility which resides above a major, regional aquifer system.





All of the information presented above is just little pieces which fit into the story of the world-class dirty bomb. But, there is truly much more to this story. We have barely "scratched the tip" of the proverbial iceberg. It is truly the things that we cannot see which will ultimately cause the most concern.




A  BUBBLING  "WITCHES  BREW"

The article called 'Big cleanup questions still loom at Hanford' (linked here and further below) discusses the volatile and deadly brew which exists in the huge, leaking underground storage tanks on the Hanford property. It also speaks about a project which is far behind schedule: one which appears to be in an impossible race against time.

The article speaks of "53 million gallons of radioactive waste." It declares that "each of Hanford's underground waste tanks holds a unique mix of hundreds of toxic compounds and radioactive isotopes." Some of these tanks have "spontaneously heated up or burped explosive gases."

In all of this, there is something important to note about what is in the tanks. The article states that, "Over the years, each has become a distinct and changing caustic brew." Of great importance is the following statement: "The waste was changing and chemically reacting all the time."

What are we truly dealing with in these tanks? Nobody really knows. How dangerous is this stuff and what are the hazards presented? Again, nobody really knows. Or, at least they are not telling the full story. All we know is, it is some of the most dangerous stuff on earth.




SUBSTANDARD  WORK,  DANGEROUS  PROBLEMS

The articles linked below show many dangerous problems relating to the substandard work at Hanford. It appears that a time bomb is being created: one which could possibly be devastating to the populace of the whole Pacific Northwest region, or even beyond. It could also completely destroy food production in the important Columbia Basin region and beyond.









CONCERNS  BY  WORKERS

The articles linked below show that even regular workers are raising safety concerns about the vitrification plant at the Hanford facility. It appears the system is definitely flawed at Hanford. Something is truly wrong. One thing is important to note. In the midst of it all, it appears that management is working hard to silence workers who note safety issues at Hanford. Why are they doing this? Is there something major to cover up?



Once again, a very key question truly needs to be asked. Is the Hanford vitrification plant an accident waiting to happen? Is a large-scale dirty bomb actually being built: one which could make the surrounding area uninhabitable, plus make the Columbia River and the Columbia Basin unusable for food production? Why are things being done this questionable way? Once again, is there a hidden agenda behind the Hanford project?




THINGS  TO  CONSIDER

In the midst of this discussion, we should definitely consider the nature of those in control at Hanford. The article, linked here and above, declares: "In his letter, Thorson [a chemical engineer for one of the Hanford contractors] says several times when he's raised concerns about the plant, he's been reprimanded or had his reputation or career injured."

Possibly, for our own good, all of us should be asking: "What is really going on at Hanford?" What is the true nature of the device being built there? Furthermore, what is the true extent of the radioactive contamination at the Hanford site, both above ground and below?




WHISTLE-BLOWERS  FORCED  OUT

It appears that certain individuals in engineering and upper management who have raised safety concerns about the Hanford project have been fired or forced off the job. The webpages linked below present the stories of some of these individuals.



Why is this happening at Hanford?  Are those in control at Hanford eliminating anyone who gets in the way of their intended agenda? Are they neutralizing or eliminating anyone who may get too close to realizing the dirty little secrets about Hanford? What is going on at Hanford?




A  NUCLEAR  DISASTER  WAITING  TO  HAPPEN

Critics of the Hanford Vitrification Plant, in the article linked below, state that "the DOE has watched its prime contractor on the site, Bechtel, grossly overcharge the American public for a waste-treatment plant so poorly built that, once it's finished (if it ever gets finished), feeding nuclear material through it could cause a catastrophe."

The article also states that "nuclear scientist Donald H. Alexander, formerly of the DOE, likened Hanford to the doomed 1986 Challenger mission, a disaster arising from an excess of confidence."



Basically, it sounds like an immense, extremely devastating "nuclear disaster waiting to happen" is being built at Hanford. This apparent "disaster waiting to happen" was, at one point, scheduled to begin operating in 2019. But then again, it appears the scheduled startup date for this facility keeps getting moved years back and the costs keep skyrocketing.




ECONOMIC  RAPE  AND  PILLAGE ?

Yes, it does appear that the American people are being greatly deceived and financially raped. It appears they are being bled dry over what may ultimately prove to be a major fiasco at the Hanford facility. Originally, the Hanford Vitrification Plant was to become operational in 2011. Then it was moved to 2018. And now...?

Just wait a few years for the new answer. In the meantime, it appears the amount of taxpayer money wilfully squandered will continue to rapidly increase. But, there are questions which need to be asked. What are the citizens actually being forced to pay for at Hanford and in what manner may it ultimately be used?




SQUANDERING  THE  MONEY

The 60 Minute article (linked here and further above) speaks of Bechtel installing defective equipment in the processing plant. The equipment is unsafe and needs to be fixed. But, because Bechtel met an installation milestone, even with defective products, they "demanded and then received a $15 million bonus for meeting a milestone."

The article linked below confirms the $15 million dollar bonus, plus gives information about what followed. It declares: "This was only to be followed months later by another DOE payment to Bechtel of $22 million for Bechtel's use in taking steps to combat its own negligence and incompetence."



Basically, defective and garbage equipment was put in place so Bechtel could get a $15 million bonus from taxpayer's money. They received this large bonus for performing shoddy work. Then, Bechtel was given another $22 million, as an apparent gift from the DOE of taxpayers money, to do a job which Bechtel should have been doing under their normal pay, that being thorough and competent work.




PAID  TO  KILL ?

It appears that Bechtel has intentionally installed extremely dangerous equipment: equipment which can create a deadly and devastating nuclear "accident" at a later date. Another question needs to be asked. Is Bechtel actually being paid to produce a system which can kill a large segment of the population?

Talk about a fast way to drastically reduce the population, if there was anyone or any organization who may desire such a thing or who would benefit greatly by such a thing. I wonder what the eugenicists experience wherever they think about Hanford?




STEALING  FROM  THE  PEOPLE

The webpage linked below shows that the U.S. Department of Energy does not want to speak about their utter mismanagement of the Hanford Vitrification Plant project, nor their squandering of taxpayer money. Have they now gone into blatant "screw you" mode, as they focus on their questionable intended purpose?



The evidence tends to indicate that large international companies and organizations, plus certain governmental agencies, are in collusion. In the case of Hanford, it appears this facility is being used as a vehicle to bleed American citizens dry, financially. Such acts should truly be classed as criminal. In principle, it appears to be no different than a thug performing blatant thievery.

In the end, do thugs often kill their victims?




UNCONTROLLED  NUCLEAR  REACTIONS

The article linked below adds more important information about the new, dangerous, nuclear processing plant being built at Hanford: that plant which is commonly called the Hanford Vitrification Plant. Regarding this plant, it declares the following:

"But parts of the plant still face risks of bursting into flames, exploding or triggering uncontrolled nuclear-chain reactions, according to project documents, interviews and formal critiques by scientists at other federal agencies."

The article declares further: "The government's own tests show that equipment may fail or pipes may clog in areas of the plant so hot with nuclear waste that no human or machine could ever get in and make repairs."



It appears that the construction of this substandard and dangerous vitrification plant is like signing our own death warrant. Possibly taxpayers have been paying for their ultimate demise all along. May this actually be one of the biggest secrets of Hanford? And yet, there is more to come.




NUCLEAR  CHAIN  REACTIONS

The webpage accessed via the button below shows graphically the difference between a controlled and an uncontrolled nuclear reaction. Please remember that uncontrolled nuclear reactions are the type which are supposed to occur at the Hanford Vitrification Plant.





WHEN  ALL  HELL  BREAKS  LOOSE

For our own good, the information presented above must be considered further. Once again, the Hanford Vitrification Plant will have areas which are so radioactively and thermally hot "that no human or machine could ever get in and make repairs." In other words, there is no way to fix a problem, even a very dangerous problem, which develops.

In the midst of such a dangerous environment, we have equipment which can fail or pipes that may clog. We have things that can explode or trigger uncontrolled nuclear chain reactions.

The bottom line is this. If something is so radiologically and thermally hot that you can't get in to fix a problem, reality says you have one general option left. When all hell breaks loose, about all you can do is stand back and see what happens (and get fried in the process), or run for all you're worth and hopefully find worthwhile cover.

Those things stated above are just part of the story. The geology of the region may be a key component in the equation for the world-class dirty bomb. It appears that a substandard and dangerous nuclear processing plant is being built, possibly with intent. When a devastating earthquake hits the region and all nuclear hell breaks loose, the builders of the killer plant may simply state that, "It was an act of God."




EARTHQUAKE  DANGER  AND  THE  FIASCO

The article below speaks of a definite earthquake danger to the new processing building being built at Hanford (the Hanford Vitrification Plant) which will eventually be full of radioactive liquid. Documentation indicates that the new processing building at Hanford is not properly engineered to withstand a devastating earthquake.

In the event of a massive earthquake, the highly radioactive material in this building could spew out into the environment and become a danger to citizens of the Pacific Northwest and beyond. Under certain circumstances, the radioactive material could also go critical and produce a deadly, uncontrolled nuclear reaction. Even a simple fire could spread radioactive agents into the air, to be dispersed over a vast area.

In regards to the new processing building at Hanford, the article below declares: "But here's what 60 Minutes has learned: that the Energy Department and the contractor, Bechtel, went ahead with the plant knowing their seismic standard might be off." Now, the cost over-runs for this project are skyrocketing, plus there is "a two- to four-year delay in completing the building" because much re-engineering must be done.



The final outcome of this construction is yet to be seen. In the meantime, we citizens must diligently look out for ourselves and the future of those we care about. It is time to stand up and be heard, while we are still able.




SERIOUS  FAULTS  AND  EARTHQUAKE  POTENTIAL

Let us consider the information available about geologic faults in the Hanford region, plus the potential for a devastating earthquake. Let us also consider the potential fate of structures at the Hanford facility, and even dams in the region upstream of Hanford, in the event of a major quake.

The webpages linked below give some very good background information. There is additional information found in the right margin of this page.



The fourth article in the links above speaks about the Columbia Generating Station at Hanford. It states: "The new evidence suggests that the region could be rocked by shaking two to three times stronger than the plant was designed for."

In a devastating earthquake, what could be the outcome of this nuclear power plant? Furthermore, what could be the outcome for the questionable Vitrification Plant? Then, there is the upstream dam situation to consider, which could potentially have an effect on Hanford.




CRACKED  INFRASTRUCTURE

The webpages linked below speak about a 65 foot long by 2 inch wide crack found in Wanapum Dam, in Washington state. This dam is on the Columbia River, a bit over 20 miles upstream from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. When divers went down to investigate, the crack was located at 75 feet below the waterline. This crack is considered as being serious.

An engineer was tipped off to the problem when a bowing was noted in the top of the dam. The bow can be seen in the second link below, in the second photo on that page. The first link declares: "The 2-inch-wide underwater crack extends horizontally across the upstream side of the 65-foot wide pier called a monolith." It also states: "The crack extends all 65 feet across the monolith."

So, a supporting monolith between two spillway gates is completely compromised. These means the dam is weakened at this point. This is a hard problem to rectify, because the upper portion of a monolith has basically broken loose from its underpinnings.



After the crack was noticed, dam staff began spilling additional water in order to reduce water level in the reservoir by 26 feet. The article linked below indicates that the reduced water level and water pressure is causing the dam to stabilize. But, the situation is still classed as serious. Yes, it is a compromised dam.



The large crack in the Wanapum Dam occurred during normal operating conditions for this dam. What could happen to dams on the Columbia River, upstream of Hanford Nuclear Reservation, in the event of a mega-quake in the Pacific Northwest? Do the pictures linked below represent the potential answer?

The collapse of the concrete Shih Kang Dam in 1999, in Taiwan, occurred in only a Magnitude 7.6 earthquake. It should be noted that the spillways of the collapsed dam are of a similar design to those at Wanapum Dam, on the Columbia River upstream from Hanford.





COLUMBIA  RIVER  DAMS

It is important to consider the dams on the Columbia River, especially those upstream of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. If upstream dams were to fail during a massive earthquake, this could create even a greater problem with radiation spread from Hanford.

The webpage linked below is somewhat troubling. It states: "The dams were all built before engineers knew about the dangers of a major quake in the Cascadia Subduction Zone."





GRAND  COULEE  DAM

Over the years, there has been much speculation as to what would happen if Grand Coulee Dam were to experience a failure. The newspaper article linked below is from 1982. The article declared: "Failure of this mammoth concrete dam spanning the Columbia River would wash out just about every other dam for 250 miles and cause massive downstream flooding." It states that: "portions of the Hanford Reservation would be flooded..."

The article indicates that the wall of water resulting from a failure at Grand Coulee Dam "would wash out Chief Joseph, Wells, Rocky Reach, Rock Island, Wanapum, and Priest Rapids dams downstream." Yes, as we know now, this would be made easier by an already compromised Wanapum Dam.

The article indicates that "the first impact of the flood wave" from a failed Grand Coulee Dam would reach the Tri-Cities "in 24 hours." It then states: "It would be 40 hours before the flood wave actually peaked." It should be noted that the Hanford nuclear site would experience this devastating wall of water before the Tri-Cities.





GEOLOGY  AROUND  GRAND  COULEE  DAM

The webpage linked below shows the major fault zones in the northwestern part of the United States. It should be noted that some of these fault zones extend up into British Columbia, Canada. When considering the situation of Grand Coulee Dam, it should be noted that the rather large Lewis and Clark Fault Zone (LCZ) extends from Montana, westward through Idaho and into Washington. The western, inferred section of the fault lies under the Columbia River in the area of Grand Coulee Dam.



The webpage linked below is from the Montana Department of Transportation. On the lower left portion of the webpage, it declares: "Interstate 90 from near Lookout Pass through Missoula is located along the Lewis and Clark Fault Zone, a series of faults that stretch between northwest Washington State and the Helena area."

Look at the preceeding statement again. Yes, "a series of faults that stretch between northwest Washington State and the Helena area [in Montana]."



A major fault zone which stretches from Montana to the eastern edge of Washington state is not what is being spoken about here. It speaks about this fault zone stretching all the way to northwest Washington. It appears that this major fault zone may connect with the Puget Sound faults. These faults could all be seriously affected by the next Cascadia Subduction Zone mega-quake.




LEWIS  AND  CLARK  FAULT  ZONE

The information linked below comes from The Geological Society of America (GSA). The page declares: "The Lewis and Clark line is a continental-scale fault zone that links Eocene extension in Montana and Idaho with that in Washington."



The Lewis and Clark Fault Zone is classed above as being "a continental-scale fault zone." As noted in the links in the section above, together with the information in this section, this major continental-scale fault zone passes through the area where Grand Coulee Dam is located. Now that you know this bit of information, some questions need to be considered.

In the event of a magnitude 9.0 or larger Cascadia Subduction Zone mega-quake, what could happen to Grand Coulee Dam and the other dams on the Columbia River system? How does all of this relate to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and the events which may take place there, during a mega-quake event?




ASSEMBLING  THE  PUZZLE  PIECES

It is time to assemble, in one place, highlights from the information presented thus far. What may the general public be facing in the times ahead? Let us start our examination by considering the questionable Hanford Vitrification Plant. Let us see the picture which is forming regarding this plant and Hanford in general.

For starters, we know that "parts of the plant still face risks of bursting into flames, exploding or triggering uncontrolled nuclear-chain reactions, according to project documents, interviews and formal critiques by scientists at other federal agencies."

Once again, "The government's own tests show that equipment may fail or pipes may clog in areas of the plant so hot with nuclear waste that no human or machine could ever get in and make repairs."

Regarding the scaling back of safety measures and equipment at the Hanford Vitrification Plant, "pipes are being designed so that explosions are expected and allowed; plant operators will just have to keep them manageable."

Near the beginning of this discussion it was noted that "The Hanford site is already the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States. It is the most contaminated site on this earth, outside of Russia." And yet, more dangerous waste will be added to Hanford. More will be brought in from other nuclear plants and nuclear facilities. The makings for a horrendous nuclear disaster will only be made larger.

It is noted in this discussion that the U.S. Department of Energy has already dumped quite a large amount of radioactive garbage at Hanford, which has come from other nuclear facilities. A large amount of this garbage is hotter than high-level nuclear waste and was dumped in unlined trenches.

There is another important factor to consider. There is a geologic part to this puzzle. What will truly happen in the event of a Cascadia mega-quake?

Let us consider the large volume of groundwater beneath Hanford which has been contaminated with at least one to six million gallons of radioactive materials from the leaking storage tanks, if not with a much greater volume. Let us also consider the large volume of radioactive waste pumped into the ground near the Columbia River, plus into the regional aquifer system via injection wells (also called reverse wells), when Hanford was making plutonium.

When the next Pacific Northwest mega-quake strikes, will the problematic storage tanks holding 53 million gallons of radioactive "witches brew" experience catastrophic failures? Will a large portion of the underground nuclear contamination and waste in the groundwater be pumped out into the Columbia River as the convulsing groundmass heaves like a pumping heart in a mega-quake? Will additional fractures in the ground allow the radioactive contaminants to have even easier access to the river and the aquifer below?

Let us consider and establish firmly in our minds what we have the makings for. Let us consider what we all could be facing in the times ahead. And yet, there is still more to the story.




WORLD-CLASS  "DIRTY  BOMB"

Here is a clear picture of only one part of what we are dealing with at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. First, the U.S. Department of Energy, plus the designers and builders of the the vitrification plant, have eliminated many safety features from the plant. They are expecting plant operators to keep the anticipated, possibly intended explosions at a manageable level. That is possibly much easier said than done. No one will simply be saying, "Oops," after the fact.

Even govenment scientists have spoken about the triggering of uncontrolled nuclear-chain reactions at the improperly designed Hanford Vitrification Plant. Is not an uncontrolled nuclear-chain reaction very similar to, or the same thing as, what is happening during the explosion of a high-powered nuclear bomb? Considering the size of the Hanford Vitrification Plant, plus all the nuclear material residing on the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, could we soon be dealing with the largest nuclear dirty-bomb in the world? Could a Cascadia mega-quake help trigger this bomb?

When the "vitrification bomb" detonates, the reaction and fire could possibly include a certain portion of the high level nuclear waste scattered around Hanford. The nuclear waste is just more ingredients to be reacted or incinerated and scattered via winds and river, far and wide across the face of the land. Is Hanford simply a major nuclear accident waiting to happen, or is it being done with full intent?




A  COMPLICATION

In the event that a mega-quake results in the failure of Grand Coulee Dam, plus other dams on the Columbia River, our picture suddenly becomes darker. After the Hanford dirty bomb goes off and contaminates the region, emergency workers will be trying to deal with this disaster. Then, about 24 hours after the devastating earthquake, the upriver flood reaches Hanford.

At the 40 hour mark, the flood starts cresting. The churning flood waters by now have scoured out a large amount of nuclear wastes and other nuclear debris. The radioactive "witches brew" is now included in the waters which rush down the Columbia River to the Pacific Ocean.




SPREAD  BY  THE  WIND

If and when a major nuclear disaster occurs at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, where will the wind carry the radiation? How far could it be spread in the United States and Canada? Could it remain in the atmosphere long enough to be spread over virtually the whole Northern Hemisphere?

There is one example which could be used in this case to give an extremely lacking picture of what would be the radiation spread from a Hanford disaster. The example is lacking for this reason. The example is dealing with visible, relatively heavy ash which precipitates out of the air rather quickly. This is different in nature from nuclear radiation.

Nuclear dust and aerosols may possibly remain in the atmosphere for much longer and be carried for much greater distances. There is another reason the following example is lacking. The example, once again, is dealing with heavy, visible, non-radioactive dust. With a nuclear disaster, we will be dealing with products which are invisible and silent, yet very hazardous or even deadly, especially if internalized.




A  MINOR  EXAMPLE

On May 18, 1980, Mount Saint Helens experienced a major eruption. This volcano is located in Washington state, about 150 air miles west of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Because of the difference between ash spread and radiation spread, this example is labled as "minor."

Linked here is a map showing the ash fall in the United States from only the May 18 eruption. This map does not show where the ash went in Canada. A Wikipedia article, linked here, declares: "Ashes from the eruption were found collecting on top of cars and roofs next morning, as far as the city of Edmonton in Alberta, Canada."

The webpage linked here gives even a better picture of where ash from the 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens went in the United States and Canada. These maps were created using satellite data. Click on the maps to view a larger image. These maps put a whole different perspective on just the ash dispersion from Mount Saint Helens. The spread of Hanford radiation could be much different and much worse.

It should be noted that there were also later eruptions of Mount Saint Helens. The ash from these eruptions was spread in different directions, because of the wind currents on those days. Some ash went generally to the west, as far as the Oregon Coast. Some went more south, into the Bull Run watershed where Portland, Oregon gets its drinking water. On other days, the wind carried the ash in other directions. A similar variation could hold true for the spread of radiation from a Hanford nuclear disaster.




NUCLEAR  EXAMPLES

The Chernobyl nuclear disaster, in 1986, and the Fukushima disaster, which started in 2011, are good examples of how radiation can be spread across the earth in both the air and water. A thorough search of all sources of information about these disasters gives a better understanding of the serious hazards which would be presented to the general public, both in the United States and Canada, by a disaster at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.



THINGS  TO  CONSIDER

Once the nuclear disaster has run its course, a large portion of the Pacific Northwest may be uninhabitable. The Columbia River may be unsafe and unusable for a period of time, if not permanently, plus food may no longer be produced in the Columbia Basin and surrounding areas.

Once it happens, there is no turning back. This will be the new world in which you live. Is this what you truly want for yourself and those you care about? If not, what are you going to do about it? Do you desire to see Hanford turned into The National Radioactive and Chemical Waste Dump?




CASCADIA  REGION  EARTHQUAKE  WORKGROUP

Let us consider the geologic situation which the Pacific Northwest faces, for it is also part of the picture. The document linked below is from the Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup (CREW). At the beginning of the document, the following statement is made.

"CREW is a non-profit coalition of business people, emergency managers, scientists, engineers, civic leaders, and government officials who are working together to reduce the effects of earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest."

CREW is a reputable group of people from the United States and Canada. They are doing their best to present the facts. They want the general public to be well informed about what they may be dealing with in the event of a magnitude 9.0 mega-quake in the Pacific Northwest.

With the proper information, people can better understand how to prepare for a massive mega-quake. The CREW findings, linked below, are definitely something for the general public to consider and take positive action on.



The report above gives much "food for thought." There may also be other factors to consider about a mega-quake in the Pacific Northwest. Could a mega-quake unleash one or more of the volcanoes in the Cascade Mountains? Could one or more cinder cones spring up in the midst of populated areas? Truly, no one knows the answers to these questions at this time. After the mega-quake, we will have all the answers.




IN  HOT  WATER

The document linked below is from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. It states: "Besides natural gas, the Columbia Basin is also known for deep ground-water circulation bringing heated waters close to the surface. Such waters are being utilized for geothermal heating purposes at Ephrata, Othello, Yakima, and Walla Walla."

It appears that Hanford is surrounded on the west, north and east by population centers utilizing geothermal heating, created by the heated waters which are close to the surface in the Columbia Basin. In the event of a mega-quake in the Pacific Northwest and fracturing of the ground, could the heated geologic structure and heated water beneath the Columbia Basin have any adverse effect on the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and its nuclear wastes?





EXTENT  OF  HANFORD  CONTAMINATON

There is yet one more part of the Hanford story which needs closer scrutiny. It is time to consider the unseen, underground disaster surrounding the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. It is time to consider information which is generally hidden from the public. It is time to consider how far the radioactive mess has traveled outside the boundaries of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.



FAST-MOVING  RADIONUCLIDES

How fast can the radioactive materials at Hanford move through the ground? Let us consider some real life experiences. The article, linked here, speaks about the leaking storage tanks at Hanford. It states that "the DOE said for decades that tank wastes would take 10,000 years to reach the ground water. It got there in less than 40."

Yes, the radioactive materials were moving through the ground about 250 times faster than the DOE had been claiming for decades. The evidence also indicates that the radioactive mess at Hanford is much greater, more serious, more widespread and more dangerous than the DOE has been stating.




THE  AQUIFER  SYSTEM

There is much more at stake than just the Columbia River, at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. It should be noted that there is a very major and important aquifer system which is being dealt with here. This aquifer system is used for irrigation purposes and food production, plus domestic use in a very large, multi-state region outside of the nuclear reservation. This link accesses a map of the aquifer. It resides under virtually all of southeast Washington, plus a large part of northeast Oregon and even part of Idaho. Hanford is located near the center of this very vital aquifer.

Here is another map of the regional aquifer. Hanford is the darker red area just left of center. The text in the upper left corner states: "The areal extent of the Columbia Plateau regional aquifer system is contiguous with the extent of the Grande Ronde Basalt." There is more said in the text. Click on it to make it larger and easier to read. To view another map with information about the aquifer system, click here. The text declares: "The Columbia Plateau basaltic-rock aquifers consist primarily of three basalt formations separated by confining units."

Here is yet another map. This one indicates direction of water flow for at least one level of the multi-level aquifer system. Information presented in this report tends to indicate that the flow direction may be different in other levels of the aquifer system, especially in the Hanford region. The level in which the uranium and other radioactive materials were injected appears to flow in a more southerly direction, as can be concluded by that which happened to the Benton City wells by mid 1947, as discussed below.

This linked webpage presents information about "cascading wells" in the regional aquifer system. It gives cross-sectional information about this important aquifer system in the midst of which Hanford resides. Once again, this aquifer system is used for crop irrigation and large-scale food production, plus community water systems. The test well shown in the first link in this paragraph is located about 12 miles west of Ritzville, Washington (as shown on Adobe Reader, page 11 of 44, in this link).

Adobe Reader, page 19 of 44, of this link, gives a much better cross-sectional view of the multi-level aquifer system which serves southeast Washington, plus parts of Oregon and Idaho. The test well shown in the diagram, and noted in the paragraph above, is located about 40 miles northeast of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in the regional aquifer system which has been contaminated with radioactive wastes from Hanford.

Information in this article shows that at Hanford's 618-11 burial site, "the aquifer stretches vertically from 60 feet to 450 feet" below the ground surface. In other words, at this burial site in the southeast portion of Hanford, the top of the multi-level aquifer is 60 feet below the surface of the ground, which is really not very deep, as far as wells go. The vertical thickness of the multi-level regional aquifer system in this portion of Hanford, where highly radioactive materials are buried, is 390 feet. There is a whole lot of water that can get contaminated in this area.




IMPORTANT  DETAILS

Here is a map which shows the hydraulic conductivity within the massive aquifer system, in feet per day. In the area of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, the hydraulic conductivity is between 100 and 2,000 feet per day. Note the following important words at the bottom of the map: "Hydraulic conductivity multiplied by the thickness of the auqifers equals the transmissivity of the auqifers."

In the map linked above, the hydraulic conductivity is the horizontal speed with which a given water mass is moving per day. The transmissivity of the auqifers indicates the volume of water which is moved horizontally through the aquifer in a day. In the case of the Hanford region, transmissivity is the volume of water contaminated with radioactive materials and chemicals which is moved per day. But, there is a lot more to the story about the transport of radioactive contaminants in aquifers, besides horizontal speed of the water mass.




CHELATING  AGENTS

This link speaks about the use of chelating agents for dissolving insoluble isotopes at nuclear facilities. It speaks about chelating agents ending up in nuclear waste disposal sites and speeding up the migration of radioactive wastes through the soil. This link (on Adobe Reader, page 2 of 12, upper left corner) indicates that high concentrations of certain chelating agents in the disposal ground above an aquifer, or in the aquifer itself, can help to mobilize or remobilize metals in the aquifer. It is also important to note that "strong chelating agents occur in natural waters." The link also indicates that chelation can affect the transport of metals in an aquifer.

The document linked here discusses the migration of a chelated radionuclide in a porous medium. This document (on Adobe Reader, page 1 of 6) indicates that "the migration of the chelated radionuclide was much faster than the ionic radionuclide." It is stated (on Adobe Reader, page 5 of 6) that "the effects of chelating agents on the migration of a radionuclide is significant because the chelating agents increase the solubility of the radionuclide for the groundwater and decrease the adsorption capacity of the sorbing geologic medium." The document also indicates that "the migration rate of the chelated radionuclide is much faster than that of the ionic radionuclide in spite of the degradation of the chelating agents and the chelated radionuclide."




AT  HANFORD

The webpage linked here shows the use of chelating agents in the nuclear waste at Hanford. This practice has allowed for quicker access of leaking nuclear wastes to groundwater and the complex aquifer system. The document linked here (on Adobe Reader, page 7 of 12) states: "Elevated levels of chelating agents...enhance the undesired transport of radioactive metals away from disposal sites."

There may be other factors involved in the transport of radioactive metals within the regional aquifer system which surrounds Hanford. There may be factors which cause radioactive materials to move even more quickly away from their point of initial introduction into the aquifer. There may also be factors which cause radioactive wastes to become more concentrated at one point in the aquifer system than at another point.

So now, how fast can radioactive contaminants really move through the complex aquifer system and geologic structure beneath the ground?




BENTON  CITY  WATER  WELLS

In late 1944, the first reactor at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation began operating. In early 1945, the first processing plant began producing significant amounts of plutonium. Regarding Hanford, the following link (on Adobe Reader, page 18 of 159) declares: "In 1945, wells present on site were contaminated with uranium and it had spread offsite to wells at Benton City by mid 1947."



The book linked below adds to the fact that uranium from Hanford had moved rather quickly beyond the boundaries of the nuclear reservation. It declares: "Tests for uranium had been positive in 300-Area wells since June 1945 and in wells at Benton City (off site) since mid-1947."



It took only about 2-1/2 years for the uranium introduced into the ground at Hanford Nuclear Reservation to travel all the way to the water wells which served Benton City. Benton City is about 20 miles from the center of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, as estimated on the map linked here.

It should be noted that there is a rather large, northwest-southeast aligned geologic feature which is situated between the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and the town of Benton City. The large feature is the geologic fold which produced Rattlesnake Mountain and the hills continuing southeast from it.

Notwithstanding this geologic complication in the area surrounding Rattlesnake Mountain, and notwithstanding the rather slow rate at which the U.S. Department of Energy claims the radioactive waste material is moving in the aquifer, the uranium somehow managed to rapidly travel many miles from Hanford to the Benton City wells by mid 1947.

The document, linked here, on page 55, declares: "In mid-1947, the use of reverse wells [at Hanford] was largely discontinued." A reason was given, but it is interesting to note that the timing of this "largely discontinued" use of reverse (or injection) wells for nuclear waste coincides with the finding of uranium in the water wells at Benton City.




CONTAMINATING  THE  COLUMBIA  RIVER

The article linked below declares: "About 330 pounds of uranium per year is released to the Columbia River from the Hanford 300 Area, according to DOE. But three irrigation outlets on the Franklin County side of the river release 3,500 pounds of uranium a year into the river from fertilizer and uranium that's naturally in the ground. In addition, the Yakima River adds about 8,800 pounds a year."



The DOE statement above may actually open the proverbial "can of worms" for the U.S. DOE. The water wells from Benton City, Washington were noted in the section above. These wells were contaminated with at least uranium as early as mid 1947. Benton City is located along the Yakima River: that river which now "adds about 8,800 pounds a year" of uranium into the Columbia River.

Across the Columbia River from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation is Franklin County: the place from which irrigation outlets "release 3,500 pounds of uranium a year into the river." There is a lot of agricultural land in Franklin County, including both circle farms and large orchards. The large circle farms are generally irrigated by high-volume wells which pump their water out of the regional aquifer which Hanford has contaminated with radioactive materials.

Let us consider the DOE statement a bit further. The total uranium going into the Columbia River from the three sources noted, according to the DOE, is 12,630 pounds per year. That is over six tons of uranium. That is somewhat near the weight of six cubic yards of concrete, depending on the proportions in the mix.

One other thing must be noted. It appears the DOE made a glaring omission in their declaration. They only spoke about uranium getting into the river from the Hanford 300 Area. What about the remainder of Hanford? Was this large omission an accident?

There is more to the story of river contamination. This document (on Adobe Reader, page 31 of 284) states: "The DOE has detected hexavalent chromium and strontium-90 in ground water beneath the area; ground water is not used within 3 miles of the 100-Area, but it is known to seep into the Columbia River in the 100-Area." It also states (on Adobe Reader, page 32 of 284): "DOE detected strontium-90 in the Columbia River at levels significantly above background."




LARGE  DUST  STORMS

The video, linked here, shows a relatively large dust storm in the Richland, Washington area. This storm occurred in the region where the Hanford Nuclear Reservation is located. The home video, linked here, shows conditions near one of the dust storms in this area. It mentions winds of 70 miles per hour. Here is a home video showing what it's like when out in the average dust storm in southeast Washington.

This link accesses a picture taken during a dust storm at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. The photo in this link was take in West Richland, which is located near the Hanford site. This link accesses a forum which shows pictures of dust storms in the region around the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

In 1996-1997, The author spent 13 months in the Tri-Cities area performing field work for the Franklin County PUD. He was caught out in some of the dust storms and realizes, from first hand experience, the amount of dust and fragments of vegetation carried in these storms.

The storms generally blew from the west to the east, which often carried materials from the Hanford area into the farming region of Franklin County. Possibly this contaminated material from Hanford is the "fertilizer" spoken about in the section above, which puts uranium into the run-off water that empties into the Columbia River.




CONTAMINATED  AGRICULTURAL  LANDS

The uranium from Hanford, which was found in the Benton City wells by mid 1947, proves how fast contamination can move through the underground aquifers in the Hanford region. Take another look at the size of the aquifer, via this link, in the midst of which Hanford resides. Let us also note once again, on this map link, how fast the water moves in the aquifer in the Hanford region. Yes, it moves at a rate of 100 to 2,000 feet PER DAY.

During the 1940s, large volumes of radioactive waste was forced into the aquifer via injection wells (also called reverse wells). Plutonium and other radioactive elements also went into the aquifer. From the maps linked above, it is obvious that farmers are pumping out of the same aquifer into which Hanford injected radioactive wastes. This contaminated water is then used to irrigate the foodcrops grown in this region.

So, there is the contaminated, wind-blown radioactive products which are carried onto the farmlands of Franklin County from Hanford. Then, contaminated water is pumped out of the aquifer onto the food crops. Is it any wonder that there is a lot of uranium in the irrigation water which flows back into Columbia River from Franklin County?




NOTING  THE  "WORD  PLAY"

A few sections above, the following words were noted from this linked article. "About 330 pounds of uranium per year is released to the Columbia River from the Hanford 300 Area, according to DOE. But three irrigation outlets on the Franklin County side of the river release 3,500 pounds of uranium a year into the river from fertilizer and uranium that's naturally in the ground."

The "uranium that's naturally in the ground" is there because that is where it was naturally injected by those in control of the injection or reverse wells at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, who were not thinking properly. Yes, this government operation naturally injected large quantities of radioactive materials directly into the ground, plus directly into the aquifer system from which the farmers in Franklin County (and also Benton County, plus other counties in the region) pump the water for their crops.

Yes, unfortunately, all this uranium, plus other radioactive materials, is now naturally in the ground, because that is where it was naturally put by the people at Hanford. Clearly, the high volume of uranium in the ground was not originally placed there by Nature. This high volume of uranium in the ground is not native to the region, nor to the very large and important regional aquifer system.

It must be remembered that uranium in wells outside of Hanford did not start showing up until mid 1947, about 2-1/2 years after Hanford started disposing of uranium and other nuclear wastes directly in the ground. Once uranium was discovered in off-site wells, it is said that Hanford largely discontinued the use of reverse wells for injecting nuclear wastes into the aquifer system. The timing for "largely discontinued" use of reverse wells was no coincidence.

Please note the use of the word "largely" in the preceeding sentence. The use of reverse wells still continued, but at a lower volume than before. In other words, less than one-half the previous volume was injected into the aquifer during a given period of time.




ANOTHER  "PLAY  ON  WORDS"

Another deceptive play on words commonly used by the powers that be and the news media regarding nuclear radiation is: "no immediate health effects." They basically mock the ignorance and gullibility of the general public when they use this phrase. Those that propagate this phrase generally know that down the road, the irradiated individuals may experience a variety of health problems as a result of their radiation exposure, possibly even very serious health problems and birth defects in their offspring.

Let us now consider an informed source. This document is the Public Health Assessment for Hanford Site. It states (on Adobe Reader, page 14 of 284): "Health effects do not always appear immediately after exposure. A latency period a time between the exposure and onset of health effects can be 3 to 30 years or more. The most significant Hanford releases leading to off-site population exposures occurred during the primary plutonium production era (1944-1972). Again, health effects, if any, from these exposures may not appear for several years or even for decades."

Now that we understand the "play on words," or deception, which is commonly used on the general public by the DOE and other powers that be, it is time to consider another facet of the problem. Because of all the radioactive materials that were "naturally" placed in the ground by the workers and controllers at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, these radioactive materials may possibly contaminate the food grown in the Hanford region, to a certain degree, plus the waters drawn from the regional aquifer.




IRRADIATED  VEGETATION

Yes, there may be a reason why the region around Hanford can really grow the crops. A certain amount of radiation in irrigation water can actually make plants grow much faster. A bit more radiation can lead to gigantism in plants, which may also include a large crop harvest or a "bumper harvest."

As the amount of radiation is increased above the point of gigantism and bumper harvests, serious deformations begin to take place because of the intense radiation altering the DNA in the vegetation. A bit more radiation and vegetation dies off. At this point there is an obvious radiation problem which no one can contest, not even the DOE.

Certain types of vegetation are more susceptible to alteration or death than others. Yes, radiation placed in the environment can be used to modify or cull the weaker species from the earth. Radiation in the environment may be the eugenists dream come true. Truly, the eugenicists did not lose World War Two. They just suffered a temporary setback.

Information about the effects of ionizing radiation on vegetation is found in the links below. Similar effects may occur with humans.



An Internet search can produce a considerable amount of information, both pro and con, about the effects of radiation on plants and humans.

The first article below comes from the International Atomic Energy Associate (IAEA). They may try to make radiation breeding sound good, but is it really?

Is it any wonder that there is such a variety of health problems in modern times? Is it any wonder there are new health problems which doctors cannot explain or find any workable solution for? Basically, the evidence tends to indicate that we are dealing with a worldwide "experiment" by adherents to the eugenics movement.





DANGERS  OF  LOW-LEVEL  RADIATION

The dangers of chronic exposure to low-levels of ionizing radiation is a hotly contested issue, worldwide. It appears that internalized radiation causes the most and largest variation in health problems. A couple of the more minor problems are noted in the articles linked below.

The first article is about CFIDS/ME, or chronic fatigue and immune dysfunction syndrome / myalgic encephalomyelitis. Today, there is a considerable amount of chronic fatigue syndrome and immune dysfunction displayed by the general public.

Welcome to the nuclear age. Possibly many thanks for mysterious health problems should go to the eugenics movement and their new, invisible and silent "tools" for genetic modification and population control.



It should be noted that the negative effects of chronic exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation can grow worse with each new generation, because of perpetual minor alterations in the DNA of humans.




RADIATION  AND  BIRTH  DEFECTS

Radiation has been stated as the cause for many birth defects and diseases. Radiation is noted as one of the causes for neural tube defects (NTDs). A list of NTDs include the following: anencephaly, encephaloceles, hydranencephaly, iniencephaly, lipomyelomeningocele, lipomeningocele, schizencephaly, spina bifida, and tethered cord.

Information implying an association between neural tube defects (NTDs) and ionizing radiation and/or heavy metals is accessed via the buttons below. The first link speaks about NTDs in the Ukraine, which are highest in areas impacted by the radiation from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

The first link states that "ionizing radiation is one of the most widely known causes of genetic mutations resulting in BD [birth defects], as well as cancer." The second link implicates both heavy metals, such as mercury, and ionizing radiation as potential causes for NTDs. It should be noted that many different heavy metals have gotten into the environment and the regional aquifer system, because of Hanford.



The link below declares: "Radiation during the first three months of pregnancy can cause birth defects such as microcephaly (small head), spina bifida (a hole in the back that marks the premature end of the spinal nerves), blindness, or cleft palate."



In regards to the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, the webpage linked below declares: "Within 2-3 years it was obvious that the rates of spina bifida and other defects of the nervous system, were many times greater than expected, particularly in one province. A few years later an excess of conjoined twins ("Siamese twins") was found. They found other nervous system problems, mainly microcephaly (tiny head)."



The webpage linked below speaks about a higher rate of certain birth defects in areas affected by the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. People in these affected areas are faced with chronic exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation and neural tube defects (NTDs) are more prevalent.





ANENCEPHALY

The webpage linked below is from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It declares: "Anencephaly is a serious birth defect in which a baby is born without parts of the brain and skull. It is a type of neural tube defect (NTD). These are birth defects that happen during the first month of pregnancy, usually before a woman knows she is pregnant."



The link below accesses a page from the Cleveland Clinic Children's. This page declares: "Anencephaly occurs when the neural tube, a narrow channel in the fetus that normally closes to form the spinal cord and brain, does not close properly between the third and fourth weeks of pregnancy."



It is important to note that the factors which cause anencephaly and other NTDs normally take effect, or occur, in the first month of pregnancy.




ENVIRONMENTAL  FACTORS

The webpage linked here is from the Texas Department of State Health Services. It declares that "paternal exposure to radiation, solvents, pesticides, and mercury...have been tentatively linked to increased NTD risk." It also states that "living in proximity to hazardous waste sites, landfill sites, and agricultural crops has been reported to increase NTD risk."

The page linked here is from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. It declares that "cephalic disorders are congenital conditions that stem from damage to, or abnormal development of, the budding nervous system." It states that "cephalic disorders are not necessarily caused by a single factor but may be influenced by hereditary or genetic conditions or by environmental exposures during pregnancy such as medication taken by the mother, maternal infection, or exposure to radiation." It also makes known that "most cephalic disorders are caused by a disturbance that occurs very early in the development of the fetal nervous system."

Let us put together a number of important factors from the entries above. It is indicated that NTDs and cephalic disorders are "caused by a disturbance that occurs very early in the development of the fetal nervous system." It is important to note that these disorders (or things which result in birth defects) "are not necessarily caused by a single factor." Let us note that "exposure to radiation" and "living in proximity to hazardous waste sites" are mentioned.




TRI-COUNTY  BIRTH  DEFECTS

The articles linked below speak of an unusual cluster of serious birth defects in the Columbia Basin region, of Washington State, which include anencephaly and spina bifida. Linked here, here, and here are some examples of spina bifida. Things have gone rather quiet in the news media about the spike in birth defects in the Hanford region, but that does not mean the problem has slowed down or gone away. The media is just not reporting it any more.

Some individuals on the Internet are blaming the nuclear disaster at Fukushima, Japan for the increase in serious birth defects in Benton, Franklin and Yakima counties. Let us consider the facts. The rare birth defect called anencephaly began to appear in January of 2010. This was long before the ongoing nuclear disaster began to unfold at Fukushima, Japan.

There was one link, a couple of sections above, which indicated that it took 2 to 3 years after the Chernobyl (Ukraine) nuclear disaster for a serious increase in birth defects to become obvious. Two years before January of 2010 would be January of 2008, which is obviously much too early for any effects from the much later occurring Fukushima nuclear disaster.



What all three of these counties have in common is close proximity to Hanford Nuclear Reservation. They also have something else in common, that being a rather complex, regional aquifer system. Hanford began contaminating that aquifer system in 1945, and by mid 1947, uranium had traveled rapidly through complex geologic features in the ground and began showing up outside of Hanford boundaries in at least the wells for Benton City, Washington, if not in other places also. Yes, the uranium contamination traveled about 20 miles in 2-1/2 years.

About the time when uranium began showing up in wells outside the Hanford boundaries, in mid 1947, the use of reverse wells to inject radioactive wastes into the aquifer was said to be largely discontinued. Once again, note the use of the word "largely." Again, this indicates that the practice of injecting radioactive wastes into the aquifer may still have continued, but on a more limited scale. Through the years, the radioactive and chemical contamination which found its way into the complex aquifer system has spread much further outside the boundaries of Hanford.




MUNICIPAL  WATER  SUPPLIES

One thing should be noted about the use of the contaminated aquifer. According to this webpage from the City of Yakima WA, it has a number of wells for domestic use. These wells draw out of the complex aquifer system which Hanford has been contaminating. There is another piece of concerning information on the page. It states: "The city has made provisions to meet water demand in the ever increasing and more frequent droughts. This will be mitigated through the installation and use of Aquifer Storage and Recovery. Water will be stored in the ground during the winter and recovered during the summer in drought years."

Besides the use of a number of municipal wells, Yakima will store fresh water from the Naches River in the underground aquifer for later use. This allows the public water system to readily receive its dose of any Hanford contamination in the aquifer. Possibly this is one of the common threads between all the woman who had babies with serious birth defects. Whether is was a rural well or city water, all had the potential for receiving water contaminated by Hanford. But, there is most likely a combination of "threads" which caused these serious birth defects.

As shown on this webpage, the city of Wapato, Washington (which is near Yakima) "maintains 5 municipal water wells which are the sources of water for Wapato's residents and customers." Wapato's wells would draw water out of the same complex aquifer system which Hanford contaminates.

Kennewick, Washington, by their webpage, uses wells for water. These wells, also, draw out of the regional aquifer system which Hanford is contaminating. To the credit of Kennewick, their Annual Drinking Water Quality Report states: "Materials that can be present in water include viruses or bacteria, radioactive substances, metals, nitrates and chemicals from industrial discharges, disinfection processes or from agricultural uses." The document also states: "City of Kennewick drinking water sources include the Columbia River and two Ranney Collector wells."

This document for the City of Pasco, Washington declares: "A source water assessment has been conducted for your water source, the Columbia River." "The Columbia River supplies all of the city of Pasco's domestic water supply." It also states: "As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity." At this point, it should be noted that a variety of materials are leaching out of the Hanford site into the Columbia River.

The City of Richland, Washington, in their Comprehensive Water System Plan, speak of "its Wellhead Protection Program for its water system." It also speaks about "the City's five groundwater supplies located throughout the City." Another section states: "The City's water system was first constructed during the 1940s to support wartime activities at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Today's modern permanent water system has evolved from this temporary system of wells." But, there is more to this story. The document also states: The water system currently utilitizes wells to augment the primary water source of the Columbia River."

Whether water is drawn out of the regional aquifer system or out of the Columbia River below the upstream boundary of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, the water has the potential for being contaminated by Hanford products to one degree or another. But, Hanford water contamination is only one piece of the complex puzzle relating to individual health problems and birth defects.

For those with an interest in municipal and private water sources, a thorough Internet search can generally provide the reader with water source types for virtually any city or town in the region, or any place in the country, for that matter.




THE  "CLEANUP"

There is something to consider about the recent spike in birth defects in south-central Washington State. It must be noted that this cluster of birth defects began making itself obvious by January of 2010. What has changed at Hanford in more recent times? Yes, a major "clean up" effort. Many sedentary wastes have been stirred up greatly during this time and many "strange" chemicals have been used in the monumental "clean up" effort. A variety of dust particles from Hanford have also gotten into the air currents of this region.

Much contaminated ground has been dug up and stirred up. Much buried radioactive materials have been exposed to the elements, including rainwater and wind. This has only helped to move the contamination more quickly and in a greater concentration into the aquifer below and into the air we breath. During this time, much radioactive waste has also been buried: some of it with the use of better methods than others. Yes, there is a nuclear nightmare and environmental catastrophy happening at Hanford.

To put matters in very simple terms, things have been greatly stirred up at Hanford. This has been happening for quite a number of years now, beginning in about 1989. This has given about 25 years for a higher concentration of radioactive and chemical contaminants to work their way into the ground and the moving water in the regional aquifer system. It has also given this high concentration of exposed contaminants time to be spread far and wide by air currents, plus animals and birds. But there is much more to this story, as we will see later in this webpage.

Again, it must be noted that serious birth defects in Yakima, Benton and Franklin counties began showing up in January of 2010. The large number of these serious birth defects in the region is a new phenomenon. Something has changed in the region in more recent times. Because the region where these birth defects have occurred surrounds Hanford, it is only reasonable to believe that the change is centered around Hanford. Because of the nature of this problem, it does not appear that it will be going away any time soon. But, what is likely at the heart of this problem?




PUMP  AND  TREAT

The webpage linked below speaks of "a pump and treat system that has been operating on the Department of Energy's Hanford site in Washington State since 1995." This early experimental pump and treat system at Hanford was relatively small. It was not a powerful, high-volume system which could readily break loose and stir up a large amount of sedentary contaminants into the waters of the aquifer.



The video linked below is from 2008. It shows that, at that time a number of new wells were being drilled into the aquifer at Hanford. These many wells are used "for monitoring contaminated ground water. Wells are also used to pump out contaminated groundwater, and treated water that meets strict regulatory requirements is returned to the aquifer." All of these new wells at Hanford were the start of a much larger and more agressive pump and treat system.



The drilling of numerous wells into the aquifer, plus a much larger pump and treat system, can readily stir things up in the complex aquifer system. In recent years, the treated water has become a mighty torrent which gushes into the aquifer from above. But, there is more to consider in this picture.

Anytime the water in an aquifer system is forced to flow at a rate higher than nature intended, erosion can potentially occur. The higher the flow rate, the greater chance there is for an erosion problem. The mighty torrent of water from the multiple injection wells may increase the chances for serious erosion within the supporting structure of the aquifer system. In principle, it is somewhat similar to the hydraulic gold miners of the 1800s. They could readily erode and take down whole mountainsides with their powerful monitors.

A forced, high flow rate within an aquifer can potentially produce voids within the structure of that aquifer. Voids, with continued high flow rates may lead to the production of caves, caverns or sinkholes. Destabilization of, or damage to the multi-level, regional aquifer system beneath the Hanford Nuclear Reservation is something which is not highly desirable, nor is the creation of a sinkhole beneath an area of radioactive wastes.

The webpage linked below declares: "The DOE's goal was to treat 1.4 billion gallons by the end of the fiscal year, which runs from October 2012 to September 2013. CH2M Hill met this performance goal three months ahead of schedule in June and has removed approximately 36 tons of contaminants so far this fiscal year." So, CH2M Hill is forcing approximately 1.4 billion gallons back into the porous aquifer system, via injection wells, in a period of nine months. That is an incredible flow of water, creating the potential for underground erosion.

The article goes on to state: "To date, Hanford contractors have treated approximately 7.8 billion gallons of groundwater and removed approximately 55 tons of contaminants, including nitrate, carbon tetrachloride, hexavalent chromium, uranium and technetium-99."





SOMETHING  TO  CONSIDER

There is one thing to consider here. "Approximately 7.8 billion gallons of groundwater" had been sucked up out of the contaminated aquifer and been filtered to remove 55 tons of contaminants, by mid 2013. Then this 7.8 billion gallons of water was rushed back into the aquifer through injection wells. The incredible flow rate of all that water gushing into the aquifer from the injection wells can really, yes, really stir things up in the contaminated aquifer.

Water gushing into the aquifer in such a great volume from the injection wells could readily stir up radioactive sediments which were possibly out of solution. Yes, a lot of contamination may have been removed from a hellaciously contaminated aquifer, but a large plume of radioactive contaminants is generally stirred up. Not all of these radioactive contaminants will be recovered by the extraction system.

The unrecovered portion of the mobile, radioactive contaminants is free to travel to other parts of the large, regional aquifer system. These mobilized contaminants may readily find their way into drinking water and irrigation systems within the region. Is it any surprise that birth defects are spiking in the region surrounding the Hanford Nuclear Reservation?




AN  ADDITION  TO  THE  LIST

In the webpage linked above, called "CH2M Hill Treats 1.4bn Gallons Contaminated Groundwater," one very important contaminant was left out of their list. It did not show one of the key contaminants which is being removed from the groundwater, which can be used for other purposes.

The webpage linked below declares: "The new central Hanford plant is removing not just chromium, but also seven additional contaminants from the groundwater: nitrate, carbon tetrachloride, uranium, technetium 90, tritium, iodine 129 and trichloroethylene."



The very important and very key material is tritium. Why is that? It is now time for a bit of history and nuclear science, before we return to what appears to be a great disaster being created in the regional aquifer system. Birth defects in the area surrounding Handford will also be considered a bit more.




THE  ENHANCER

The link below declares that "Tritium (3H) is essential to the construction of boosted-fission nuclear weapons" The tritium is mixed with deutrium to get the desired effect in boosted nuclear bombs. The webpage continues: "This process releases a flood of 14 MeV neutrons which cause additional fissions in the device, greatly increasing its efficiency." What this means is, tritium is necessary to give much more "bang power" or much greater destructive power to your standard nuclear bomb.



The page linked below declares: "A few grams of tritium inside a bomb help to produce a more efficient chain reaction - the same destructive energy from less fuel. This translates into smaller, lighter warheads." So, with the use of tritium, you get more bang for your buck in your nuclear weapon. With the help of tritium, even a large, existing nuclear bomb could be given the ability to create much more havoc.



The article linked below is from 1986. It indicates that, in 1986, tritium was the U.S. military's "number 1 weapons priority."



This information about tritium brings up a question. What type of destructive power would be experienced if tritium was combined in a special way with depleted uranium weapons on the battlefield? Possibly it could give those rifle bullets and anti-tank shells some extra kill power. It would be the nuclear weapon which just keeps on killing. But, let us not deviate too far from the intended path for this report. Let us return to the typical nuclear device and a problem associated with tritium.




A  DISAPPEARING  ACT

Tritium is a radioactive element which is constantly decaying. It has a half-life of about 12.3 years. It is constantly disappearing as it converts into helium. For this reason, tritium in the nuclear arsenal needs to be replaced every now and then, if the military is to maintain or increase the destructive power of its individual nuclear weapons. But this brings up a problem.

There has been concern in the military about a source for new tritium, since the government's tritium-producing reactor at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina was closed down in 1988 "for safety reasons." It appears there were just too many accidents and near accidents at this facility. So, in the midst of a very unstable world, the military has been looking for a reliable source for its desired tritium.




PRESTO,  HANFORD

The article linked below declares: "Seeping radioactive waste from buried discarded fuel at Hanford Nuclear Reservation (WA) was found in February to have caused a fourfold jump in the tritium level of groundwater at the site." It states that "water sampled from one well is now more than 350 times that permitted by U.S. EPA drinking water standards."



The article below is from 'The Seattle Times.' It declares: "A groundwater sample shows the presence of tritium at 400 times the federal drinking-water standard in a monitoring well 3.6 miles from the Columbia River at the Hanford nuclear reservation."



The article linked below declares: "In the 1960s, highly radioactive wastes from the 300 Area - including 11 to 22 pounds of plutonium - were buried at 618-11 just northwest of Energy Northwest's complex. The wastes are in a variety of large containers, with many bottomless for unknown reasons. Hanford's records are incomplete on the wastes buried there."

About 15 years ago, monitoring was performed in a well east of the 618-11 site, where concentrated tritium was found in groundwater samples from the aquifer. This tritiated water displayed a radioactivity level of 8 million picocuries per liter. The article also indicates that the top of the aquifer system in this area is only 60 feet below ground level.



When the military heard about tritium levels in the aquifer beneath Hanford, they may have experienced a moment of excitement. But, for the rest of us, we may need to look closer at the attributes of tritium.




TRITIUM  IN  THE  AQUIFER

The last article linked above presents a very important and key piece of information. It states: "Tritium is Hanford's fastest-moving subterranean radioactive liquid - moving at the same speed as groundwater." This tritium which is steadily "moving at the same speed as groundwater" is very important for us to remember.

Why does tritiated water flow at the same speed in the regional aquifer system and in our water pipes as does normal groundwater? It does so, because tritiated water is simply "a radioactive form of water." It looks like water, tastes like water, and feels like water. But, there is a problem with this radioactive form of water.

Regarding radioactive tritium in our bodies, it is noted in the webpage linked here that it "can be incorporated into our DNA." Internalized tritium "can disrupt our genetic code." Chronic exposure to tritium, from things like drinking tritiated water and food, "can increase rates of cancer and birth defects." The page states: "A developing fetus is particularly susceptible to damage from exposure to radiation." So, the rise in serious birth defects in the Hanford region comes as no surprise, since there is tritium and other radioactive contaminants in the aquifer.

So, how can we discern if tritium is in our drinking or irrigation water? Can a Geiger counter show its presence? Not really, as show on this linked page under the heading of 'Detection'. The page indicates that it takes more involved procedures and expensive equipment for performing things like "a wipe test from a liquid scintillation counter" to detect tritium in water. The abstract in this link speaks of three different methods for determining the presence of tritium in groundwater.




RATE  OF  TRAVEL

The article linked here states that groundwater in the area of the Hanford 618-11 burial site "takes five to 30 years to reach the Columbia." The author has reason to believe that the groundwater in the aquifer could move more quickly in this area. The map linked here indicates a hydraulic conductivity in this area of somewhere between 100 and 2,000 feet per day. This would indicate that the tritium may reach the river in a period as short as 10 to 190 days.

It should be noted that a large amount of new tritium is constantly being formed in the regional aquifer system as a result of a reaction with all those radioactive wastes which have gotten into it via leakage and intentional injection. So, what is Hanford and the military planning to do with the all that fast-moving, radioactive tritium in the aquifer?




A  MINING  OPERATION

Tritium (and a lot of it) is one of the radioactive materials being recovered by the large-scale Hanford 'pump and treat program.' The pump and treat program is a very major tritium and nuclear materials mining operation. Hanford is like a vast, continually renewable "goldmine" for all those materials needed to build, maintain and enhance nuclear weapons of mass destruction. So, the so-called "cleanup" project at Hanford may never really come to an end.

Yes, there may be a very logical reason for all the delays and repeat problems in the "cleanup" project for the leaking underground waste materials at Hanford. There may be a very logical reason for the extended "cat and mouse game" which has been played with the general public. There may be a very logical reason why the DOE is running roughshod over the general wishes, and even the votes, of citizens in the Pacific Northwest.

Why would the government or the military ever truly want to clean up Hanford? Why would the DOE ever want to stop dumping more nuclear wastes from around the country into the highly contaminated Hanford site? The more nuclear waste the DOE hauls in from other sites around the country and dumps at Hanford, the higher the production which could be expected from this very subtle and concealed "tritium factory."

There may actually be a whole lot more to the Hanford waste "cleanup" story. If radioactive waste materials are layered in a certain manner in the ground, it may be possible to create a very subtle type of nuclear reactor. This subtle reactor could continually create a new supply of weapons grade plutionium, without the general public ever suspecting what is really being done. Yes, what a "goldmine" for those desiring weapons of mass destruction.




FOOLED  AGAIN  FOLKS,  BIG  TIME !

The article linked below was posted about 15 years ago. At that time, people were left with the impression that Hanford would not be used for the production of tritium for nuclear bombs.

True, the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) at Hanford would not be restarted for the production of tritium. But, it appears the U.S. Department of Energy had a much more subtle plan for producing tritium and other weapons grade materials at Hanford. Its called the pump and treat program, and possibly also a particular method for stacking radioactive wastes in burial grounds.



The article below shows that Hanford's pump and treat program has caught the attention of the world. The treatment system "is being called a technological marvel" and people are congratulating one another. But, could the pump and treat program actually be a devastating "Trojan Horse?"



It appears there is a very serious price to pay for the foolishness and deception occurring at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. It appears that the important, multi-state regional aquifer system is becoming seriously contaminated with radioactive materials and other products from Hanford. Possibly this contamination has something to do with the spike in serious birth defects in the region surrounding Hanford.




THE  "CANARY  BIRDS"

The webpage linked below speaks about the use of canary birds by coal miners. It declares: "Canaries are especially sensitive to methane and carbon monoxide, which made them ideal for detecting any dangerous gas build-ups. As long as the bird kept singing, the miners knew their air supply was safe. A dead canary signaled an immediate evacuation."

The webpage notes something else which is very important. It states: "The phrase 'living like a canary in a coal mine' often refers to serving as a warning to others." And so it is today, in regards to Hanford.



The link below accesses a page by the March of Dimes. It speaks about neural tube defects (NTDs) like anencephaly and spina bifida. These are two of the serous birth defects being experienced in the Hanford region. There is something very important to note.

The page states: "Girls are three times more likely than boys to have anencephaly." This is one thing to watch for, but there is more. It says: "In North America, Hispanics are at highest risk of having a baby with an NTD, followed by whites. NTDs are less common among Ashkenazi Jews, blacks and most Asians."



High doses of ionizing radiation have been implicated in serious birth defects. But, there is more to this story. When the Hispanic population in the Hanford region begins to experience a significant increase in NTDs, the other nationalities better take note. The whites are next on the list.




HEAVY  METALS  AND  OTHER  TOXINS

While we are at it, let us consider the use and storage of heavy metals and toxins at Hanford. The webpage linked here is called "Hanford and Human Health." At Hanford, besides the large amount of radioactive metals, there is a considerable amount of: "chromium, mercury, lead, cadmium and arsenic." The page also speaks about beryllium, acids and organic compounds, plus their serious health effects.

The webpage linked here is called "How Hanford Works." Of Hanford, it declares: "Apart from the radiation, there is severe chemical contamination as well, including large pools of carbon tetrachloride, hexavalent chromium, lead, mercury, and thousands of other chemicals. Contamination flows into the Columbia River at higher-than-permissible levels in several locations unabated, year after year, and hot spots are identified, usually by independent activists, on an alarmingly frequent level."

This webpage declares: "In June 2005, GAP released a report showing previously unknown measures of radioactivity around the perimeter of Hanford. The study includes the first reports of plutonium in Columbia River marine life." "In addition to plutonium being found for the first time in fish, increased levels of strontium, mercury, beryllium, uranium, and cesium were detected in aquatic creatures." "Also, an area of the Columbia River 20 miles upstream from the Hanford site contained high uranium readings."

The "area of the Columbia River 20 miles upstream from the Hanford site" containing "high uranium readings" is discussed in more detail further up in the left side margin, beginning under the heading called "In the River."




GOVERNMENT  AND  MEDICAL  ESTABLISHMENT

Yes, it appears that government agencies and the medical establishment are acting very puzzled about all these birth defects in the Hanford region in recent times. But those who have some idea about individual body chemistry and the potential long-term dangers of even low-level, internalized nuclear radiation, plus contamination in aquifers and the air, are not puzzled at all. And, those who understand the eugenics movement, may understand even better.





A  COMPLEX  PUZZLE

Further above, under the heading of 'Municipal Water Supplies,' it was noted that contaminated water from the regional aquifer could be one of the "threads" which tie together the large number of serious birth defects in the Columbia Basin. But there are possibly more parts to this puzzle. As noted earlier, there could be a combination of various "threads" involved.

The prevailing wind in Yakima, Washington is from the west, as shown in this link. It blows out of the west about 31% of the time. But, for about 6% of the time it is blowing out of the east, from the direction of Hanford. Winds from the east may readily carry contaminated particles from Hanford to the Yakima region, plus with shifts in wind direction, to virtually any part of the area surrounding Hanford. Under the proper conditions, certain pregnant women may inhale and internalize a number of "hot" radioactive particles. The radiation they receive, or the combination of irradiations they receive from various sources, could have a detrimental effect on a fetus they are carrying.

The wind does not uniformly spread radioactive contaminants across the countryside. Turbulence and eddy currents in the atmosphere can concentrate and deposit airborne contaminants at one locale, while the remainder of the area may be relatively unaffected. The Chernobyl map linked here is one good example of contaminant distribution. Look how spotty the distribution pattern can be. Possibly one person could receive high levels of radiation, while their neighbor received much less, or virtually none at all.

There is something else to consider in the abnormal rate of birth defects in Washington state. After the early part of 2011, the ongoing Fukushima nuclear disaster added another possibility for radioactive contamination. The ever-changing distribution pattern of contaminants could have concentrated more radiation in the locale where the women were in the first part of their pregnancies. But, this factor would have only come into play in 2011, more than a year after the first cases in the cluster began to appear in January of 2010.

The webpage linked here presents another potential "thread" in the birth defect puzzle. This factor is food which is contaminated with ionizing radiation. When contaminated food is eaten, the ionizing radiation it contains becomes internalized. Internalized radiation can wreak havoc on fetuses. The investigations of a prestigious geneticist have indicated the problems created by internalized radiation. This geneticist speaks about radiation in the environment which is "inhaled or swallowed, leading to accumulation in the body." And, "radiation is an agent that can not only cause birth defects, but alter the human genome with long-term effects on future generations."

There is another factor to add into the mix, and that is individual body chemistry. The radiation which may detrimentally affect one person may not harm another person at all. It may be somewhat like the saying, "One man's meat is another man's poison." Life is about combinations. When the combinations are in your favor, things work out right. But if the combinations are not in your favor, something less desirable can take place.




SEEING  THE  LIGHT

Regarding the serious birth defects in the Columbia Basin, the combinations in the environment were not favoring these particular women at that particular time in their life, when their fetuses were most vulnerable. But, one thing will be noted. The author's research leads him to believe that the Hanford Nuclear Reservation played a big part in these serious birth defects. It should also be noted that the three counties where these birth defects occurred surround Hanford. A person does not have to be a rocket scientist in order to see the light.



ACROSS  THE  RIVER

With the contamination from Hanford Nuclear Reservation entering the regional aquifer system at such a high rate, the radioactive contamination can cause probems in virtually any direction from Hanford. One example of radioactive contamination in water wells on the Franklin County side of the Columia River, across from Hanford, is shown in the newspaper article linked below.

The article is from October 11, 1987. It states that these contaminated wells were "two community drinking water wells across the Columbia River from Hanford's 300 Area, where uranium from nuclear wastes is leaking into the river." The article states that "one of the wells is also contaminated with low levels of radioactive Iodine 129, according to recently disclosed Hanford documents."



Once again, let it be noted that this radioactive contamination from Hanford in water wells on the Franklin County side of the Columbia River was verified to the general public in 1987. That was more than 2 decades ago.




IN  ALL  DIRECTIONS

Let it clearly be noted that radioactive contamination from Hanford has been showing up in domestic water sources for quite some time, starting in 1947. The information presented in this webpage shows that this radioactive contamination has gone in many directions in the aquifer system outside of the boundaries of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation since that time.



EPILOGUE

This webpage is a basic introduction to the situation at Hanford Nuclear Reservation and that which is facing the general public. There is actually a whole lot more to this story of Hanford and the situation in the Pacific Northwest.

A more complete story about Hanford includes an examination of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor, the Atomic Energy Commission. We would have to consider DOE involvement with radiation releases, genetic modification and the eugenics movement. There is also a lot more to consider about the geology of the Hanford region and our world. The geologic issue is breached in the section which follows.

This page is already rather long. There is a considerable amount of information to think about. Other parts of this story will have to find their place on other pages which are added to this site.

Regarding the DOE and genetic modification, the button below accesses a lengthy presentation on the eugenics movement and those involved with it. It also presents information about the movement behind atrocious things which have happened and are happening on our earth. The linked page gives some good foundational history. It may help expand your understanding of why things are happening in the way they are on this earth. It may even help to explain why our economy and our employment situation are in such a mess.


NOTE: The author has yet to update the webpage linked above. It is true that the Internet is a somewhat unreliable place where information and pages come and go. For that reason, there could be some links in the page above that are not working. As time and money are available, the author intends to update the page and make sure that all links are tied to relevant information. If you find links which are not working, please contact the author via the contact button in the menu bar at the top of this page. Thank you for your participation, support and patience.






Tracking  the  Rift  Toward  Hanford

A documented report by:  David E. Sakrisson
Independent Researcher and Investigative Reporter

Copyright © 2014-2018  by  David E. Sakrisson
All Rights Reserved



Pick on any links below to obtain further information on a subject.




AN  INTRODUCTION

The discussion in this section is related to the geologic information about the Hanford region, which is presented in the upper to mid-portion of this page's right margin. It is also related to the information in the main section above, under the headings of 'Earthquake Danger and the Fiasco' and 'Serious Faults and Earthquake Potential.'



AN  OLD  SAYING

More than one hundred years ago, the famous essayist, poet and philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson declared: "We learn geology the morning after the earthquake, on ghastly diagrams of cloven mountains, upheaved plains, and the dry bed of the sea."

Yes, the morning after the earthquake, we learn new things. We may find that our commonly accepted theories were lacking in one area or another. Sometimes, it has been shown that popular theories were completely wrong. Then, new theories are created to replace or modify the old.

With the above thoughts in mind, let us first lay down some basic physical principles which affect geology and the way things happen upon this earth. Then we will continue into the discussion about the concealed rift system and its proximity to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.




ROCKS  FLOWING  LIKE  PLASTIC

The webpage linked here (on Adobe Reader page number 23 of 124) states the following: "At low pressures, rocks are brittle and tend to fracture when subjected to differential stress. At high pressures, rocks are ductile and flow like plastic." For those interested in the concept of rocks which flow like plastic, an Internet search on rock plasticity may be in order.

The concept of plastic, readily deformed rock is important in any discussion about geologic events taking place within this earth. Scan through the document linked above and look at the pictures. Here you will see layers of rock which, because of pressure and heat, are deformed in the most amazing ways. Yes, these layered rocks were made to deform as if they were soft plastic.




SPECIFIC  GRAVITY  AND  BUOYANCY

It is time to consider specific gravity and buoyancy, and how it relates to the continents and oceans of this world. The book linked here declares: "Continental material...[with] an average specific gravity of only 2.7, it was thought to 'float' on the denser material which made up the sea floor and which underlies the continental material at depth." The linked book also speaks about "the discontinuity between granitic and basaltic material."

The book, linked here, is from 1906. It is interesting to note that the old data presented in this book is very close to what is being stated today in science. The book states: "The average specific gravity of continental types of rock is taken to be 2.68." Today we commonly round the number off to 2.7. The book also states: "The specific gravity of the rocks composing the ocean floor is taken to be 2.96." Again, science commonly rounds the number off to 3.0.

The simple laws of common science and physics indicate that materials with a lower specific gravity tend to "float" on top of materials with a higher specific gravity. So it commonly is in this earth.




THE  FLOOR  BENEATH

Science, as commonly taught, speaks about the "heavier" ocean crust "subducting" below continents. Here is one drawing from the Internet which illustrates oceanic crust sliding under the continental landmass, rather than riding up over it. Here is another typical drawing showing oceanic crust positioned beneath continents. Here is yet another typical drawing, as science commonly teaches things.

Let us consider the plain, simple facts. Science clearly understands that the higher-density basaltic materials which make up the ocean floor can move under and exist beneath the lower-density materials which make up the continental landmass. But, what really happens after that? The simple truth is, no one truly knows. No one can actually guarantee what happens with the basaltic oceanic floor once it is under the continental landmass.

There are many theories and speculations in science, but no permanent guarantees. The theories in science only remain as valid until they are proven wrong by later findings or by the acts of Nature itself.




BEGINNING  THE  SEARCH

A portion of the mid-oceanic ridge and rift system resides in the bottom of the Gulf of California, between Baja California and the mainland of Mexico. This portion of the rift system does not simply stop here, but, the oceanic rift continues northward and actually resides under the continent.

In this section, physical and geological evidence will be presented which may help to reveal, with a reasonable degree of accuracy, the general location of the rift system under the continental mass. Some new theories will be presented, plus old theories may be modified somewhat.

Remember the theory of drifting continents which science teaches? When the North American continent made its westward trip across the ocean, it actually crossed over the oceanic ridge and rift system. We can now do a reasonable job of deciphering the general location of the overridden rift by physical effects on the surface.




FIRST  COLLISION

As the North American continent made its westward trip across the ocean, it slammed into some islands. These islands were located on top of the oceanic ridge and rift system. They were similar in nature to Iceland, which sits on top of the Mid-Atlantic ridge and rift system.

As the continent slammed into the islands, the western side of the rift moved northward in relation to the continent's southern coastal movement. Possibly there was some "crumpling" rotational movement occurring to get this relative north-south movement, much like the crumpling and twisting of metal and plastic which occurs during a serious car wreck on the highway.

When the massive collision came to an end, the rubble of the islands was embedded in the continent. The islands are now included in the Coast Ranges of Oregon and Washington, plus northern California.




BAJA  CALIFORNIA

As a result of the massive collision and the relative northward movement of the western side of the rift, in relation to the continental landmass, Baja California was ripped loose from the mainland of Mexico and separated from it, while being shoved about 300 miles north. As Baja California was shoved northward, it put great pressure on the landmass north to northeast of it, with an immense wedging type of action.



SAN  ANDREAS  FAULT

The great pressure created by the northward movement of Baja California fractured the landmass in many places. The first major fracture became the steeply northwest-southeast aligned San Andeas Fault.

Another illustration of the San Andeas Fault is linked here. An interactive map of the San Andeas Fault is found on this page. Drag the map so you can see the southern end of the San Andeas Fault. It is located at the northern tip of the Gulf of California, where the oceanic rift penetrates under the landmass.

The author does not believe that the major, deep-seated oceanic rift follows the San Andreas fault north-northwestward and then out to sea. Instead, he believes that the San Andreas fault is rather a shear line in the upper crust, while the "big guy," the actual rift, resides much deeper under the ground mass.




CREATING  THE  SIERRA  NEVADA

The force of the movement, which created the San Andreas Fault, put a considerable amount of stress upon the mainland of what is now the United States. The immense stress created large north-south aligned cracks in the landmass. The section of landmass by the cracks tilted upward and became the Sierra Nevada Mountains.

The Sierra Nevada is commonly called a fault-block mountain. The block of crust was pushed from the west until it rotated upward and ended with its eastern edge thrust high up into the air. A good animation which illustrates the creation of a fault-block mountain system is shown in this link.




KLAMATH  MOUNTAINS

The Klamath Mountains are located in northern California and southwestern Oregon. This link declares that the Klamath Mountains include the "Trinity Alps, the Marble Mountains, the Siskiyou Mountains, Eddy Range, the Salmon Mountains, and the Castle Crags."

The Wikipedia entry linked here, states: "The rocks of the Klamath Mountains originated as island arcs and continental fragments in the Pacific Ocean." The Klamath Mountains were some of the islands picked up and imbedded in the continent as North American overrode the oceanic ridge and rift system.




BROTHERS  FAULT  ZONE

During a massive collision of vehicles on a highway, the vehicles may not end up facing the direction which they were headed before they collided. In the collision of the North American continent with the islands of the oceanic ridge and rift system, the continent and islands pivoted in relation to one another. This pivoting during the "crunching period" created immense pressure in the continent in a northeasterly direction.

The pressure in the northeasterly direction created northwest-southeast aligned fractures in the landmass. One very well known system of fractures is called the Brothers Fault Zone (BFZ). Closer to the Klamath Mountains and parallel to the BFZ are the Eugene-Denio Fault Zone and the McLouglin Fault Zone. Yes, the massive collision of the continent with the islands created a lot of fractures in the landmass. Some fractures "spidered" off in different directions.




A  BIGGER  PICTURE

The collision of the continent with the islands which became the Kalamath Mountains was so forceful that it created ripples and stresses in the landmass. The stresses caused a series of northwest-southeast aligned fault zones. Some of these fractures are now located further north in Oregon, Washington and Idaho, plus even into Montana, as shown on the map linked here.



BENDING  THE  COLUMBIA  RIVER

During the twisting and turning collision, virtually everything along the west coast of the continent was pushed in a northward direction. Because of collisions with other islands, the stresses along the Oregon Coast pushed things strongly in a north-northeasterly direction. The great pressure against the landmass caused the portion west of what are now the Cascade Mountains to shift northward. This northward movement of the landmass caused the Columbia river to bend northward at what is now Portland, Oregon.

The landmass west of the Cascade Mountains, in the area of Portland, Oregon, shifted about 50 miles northward, as the continent pivoted over the oceanic rift that the continent had overridden. This bend in the river, between Portland, Oregon, and Longview, Washington, is clearly seen in the map linked here. This bend in the river, along with other factors, tends to indicate to the author that the ancient oceanic rift may possibly reside deep down somewhere near Portland, Oregon and Longview, Washington. More on this issue shortly.




YAKIMA  FOLD  AND  THRUST  BELT

The powerful impact with the islands along the coasts of northern California and southwestern Oregon caused a series of northwest-southeast aligned stresses and fractures (faults) to be created far inland, again, as shown on the map linked here. The intense pressure also caused the land to ripple and form the Yakima Fold and Thrust Belt.

Hanford Nuclear Reservation is located in the midst of this fold and thrust belt. (Zoom in on this linked map to see more details about the geology in and surrounding the Hanford site.) This is not a very good situation.




CONNECTING  HANFORD  TO  THE  SOUND

There are a number of reputable scientists stating that the faults in the Hanford area pass under the Cascade Mountains and connect with the fault network in the Puget Sound area. This creates a rather dangerous situation for the facilities at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, especially for the questionable vitrification plant, in the event of a mega-quake.

Let us now begin to examine geologic links which may help to locate the ancient rift system. This rift system may actually be the "trigger" for the next mega-quake in the Pacific Northwest of the United States, which ultimately releases its effects upon the Hanford nuclear site.




DEEP  DOWN  CONNECTION

On May 18, 1980, Mount Saint Helens, in Washington state, experienced a massive eruption. This was followed by a number of smaller events. Another geologic event occurred further south, during the active period of Mount Saint Helens. On June 9, 1980, there was a magnitude 6.2 earthquake which struck the Mexicali Valley in Baja California.

At the time, scientists involved with Mount Saint Helens declared that there was no connection between the Mexicali earthquake and the erupting volcano. But, could there have been? Mexicali is located where the deep-seated oceanic rift enters the continental landmass. But, let us not stop here. Let us see if there is any other indicator of a connecting rift deep under the landmass.




UPPING  THE  ANTE

In 1906, a massive earthquake devastated the San Fransisco, California, region. The epicenter for the earthquake was located near the city. This is as far as common geology teachings go, regarding this quake and the rest of the west coast of the United States. But, is there more to this story that can tie the San Fransisco earthquake to a rift located somewhere beneath the Interstate-5 corridor?



A  TELL-TALE  SIGN

During the time of the 1906 San Fransisco earthquake, there was another interesting event which happened. This geologic event virtually passed with little notice. Information about it is almost non-existent on the Internet. If it were not for one publication of the era, the author would not even know of this event.

The September 1907 issue of Popular Mechanics magazine has an interesting article on page 994. The name of the article is 'A Mystery Island.' The 1907 article states: "Denver Island is, at this writing, one of the San Juan group in Puget Sound."

The article declares that this island way up north in Puget Sound (near Seattle, Washington) "completely sunk beneath the water during the San Francisco earthquake." Later, before the writing of the article, the island came up from its watery grave. The article states that "The trees and foliage were all dead and slime covered the surface once green with grass."

Was this geologic event with Denver Island simply a coincidence, or does it indicate the presence of the deep-seated rift running northward beneath the continental landmass? Does the rift show its presence by these interconnected events in San Fransisco and the sinking of Denver Island? Does it show its presence by the 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens, in Washington state, and the earthquake in Mexicali, Baja California?




DISTANCE  FROM  THE  RIFT

It is time to consider how far the Hanford Nuclear Reservation is from the rift located deep under the landmass. If the rift is located somewhere under the Interstate-5 corridor through California, Oregon and Washington, or even further east, under the Cascade Mountains, how far would the rift be from the Hanford nuclear site? The answer is, possibly less than 175 miles.

If this deep-seated rift can have a strong effect on the fault system which passes under the Cascade Mountains and into the Hanford site, then Hanford could be in for some very serious problems when the next mega-quake occurs.




INTO  THE  MIX

There is one more geology map which can be thrown "into the mix" to give more "food for thought." It is linked here. It comes from the page linked here. The map shows the pre-accretion subduction zone and the post-accretion Farallon subduction zone. This is just one more thing for the thinking reader to consider.

Take a good close look at that map. The post-accretion Farallon subduction zone, claimed on the map, is located very near the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Would a subduction zone located here have any effect on earthquake hazards in the Hanford region?

As these things are considered, let us remember the deep-seated source of heat for geothermal energy which is located under the Columbia Basin. Its geothermal energy is used in population centers surrounding the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. This geothermal source and its use was noted in this section, much further above.

Definitely, something is going on down there deep in the earth, and it may not be in the best interests of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, in the long run.



This site was originally hosted at http://desakrisson.topcities.com     The full site has now been moved here.
This site is constructed, updated and Copyright © 2006-2018 by David E. Sakrisson.   All Rights Reserved.



Words of Wisdom

There was a very wise statesman named Edmond Burke. He lived in the 1700s. He made some statements which are very applicable in our day. His sayings now follow.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

And again, Mr. Burke declared:

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent."

Edmond Burke was also the one who declared:

"Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it."

This individual seemed to have much wisdom. Here is another of his sayings:

"The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse."

The saying above is very fitting, especially in regards to the nuclear industry and its controllers. The saying is also applicable in relation to the nuclear bombs and depleted uranium weaponry held by the military.

Yes, a weaponry is given to our service people which can harm their health and produce birth defects in their offsprings, plus eventually end their lives early.

What is being done to our people by the elitists who dominate and manipulate us for their interests, rather than the good of the nation and humanity at large?





Area History

What is now the Hanford Nuclear Reservation was formerly an agricultural area. It is also the ancestral lands for a number of Native American tribes.

The Hanford area included a couple of small towns. One town was called Hanford and the other was White Bluffs.

These two towns were condemned and destroyed by the U.S. Government to make way for the nuclear reservation, while their inhabitants were displaced.

The Native Americans in this region were also displaced from their ancestral lands. Their cultures were forever changed.


White Bluffs

This link declares that White Bluffs "was one of the first European-American settlements along the Columbia River in Washington Territory."

The above link states that the original town of White Bluffs was on the east side of the Columbia River. The town then expanded onto the west side of the river. Then, the link states, "When the railroad arrived in 1913, the town moved again to a third site close to the railway."

There is a lot of interesting history in the link above.

Here is another link with pictures of White Bluffs taken in different years. This link is a slideshow of White Bluffs.

This link shows some of the buildings which were in White Bluffs, plus some that are still standing. Click on the pictures to see larger images.

This link is a photo gallery of white Bluffs and Hanford.





Columbia River

The Columbia River starts at two lakes in British Columbia, Canada. It flows north for about 200 miles before turning south and crossing into the United States.

Once in the U.S., the Columbia drains parts of seven states before it empties into the Pacific Ocean. This information can be found in the link below.



The links below access maps showing the Columbia River and its drainage basin.



The Columbia River is used for irrigating a vast area of farmland and orchards. Fish are also harvested from the river.

Because of food production, this river needs to be kept clean and radiation free. Unfortunately, Hanford may ruin this river, along with many of its valuable resources.





Columbia Basin

The links below access pictures of some of the agricultural land and products from the Columbia Basin.



The Columbia Basin is a very important agricultural area. Its products are shipped around the United States, plus shipped to various Asian countries.



The Columbia Basin produces a lot of agricultural goods for the nation and the world. Unfortunately, a serious mishap at Hanford Nuclear Reservation could put an end to all of this goodness.





Cascadia

It is now time to piece together the story of those natural things which could trigger a nuclear disaster at Hanford.

The YouTube video, linked below, is an animation of a M9.0 quake which could hit the Pacific Northwest at any time.

The animation was originally created by the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network.

James Roddey was formerly the Earth Sciences Information Officer for the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. Part of his job was to give presentations about the effects of a massive earthquake in the Pacific Northwest.

Mr. Roddey has added commentary stating what people would be experiencing during one of these mega-quakes.




In Portland

The webpage linked below declares that "the shaking in Portland will continue for at least four minutes. Portland will feel a quake with a strength, duration and destruction never before experienced in the developed Western world."

The link also states, "The rattling will grow into a pulsing undulation that will repeatedly shove the ground up and down as much as 6 feet."



Ground wave "as much as 6 feet" high are astounding, with a duration of "at least four minutes."

Yes, the destruction from such an event will be astounding.


Affected Area

As the video above showed, the earthquake will extend from northern California to northern Vancouver Island, Canada.

This means Seattle and the Puget Sound area will also be slammed by this mega-quake.

The earthquake will be felt up to 2,000 miles away. That means that shaking could be experienced up to 2,000 miles inland.

Hanford Nuclear Reservation is well within the 2,000 mile range from the traveling epicenter in which shaking will be experienced. Hanford is only about 200 miles from the coast.

But there is more to this story.





Fold/Thrust Belt

The article linked below speaks of how "seismic forces created the craggy hillsides and deep fissures of Washington's Yakima Fold and Thrust Belt."



The page linked below speaks of the west-northwest to east-southeast trending ridges and valleys in which the Hanford Nuclear Reservation is situated.

It declares: "Geologists now understand that those ridges were created by tectonic squeezing, and that each conceals a fault."







Concealed Faults

The article below speaks of "the rupture of a rare, hidden fault that is invisible at the surface." This rare, invisible, hidden fault caused a "devastating earthquake."

It is interesting to note that "the main shock on this fault was followed by a smaller one 10 seconds later at a fault 5km away."

This is how geology works. Things are interrelated in this earth. When one fault moves, it can trigger others in its region of influence.



The surprise, 2003 quake at Bam destroyed the town and killed 26,000 people.

There are many things of value in the article above. It speaks of hidden or blind faults being "formed by compressive stresses."

The article states: "Blind thrust faults are buried under the uppermost layers of crust, but they cause the surface layers to fold over them as they deform, forming a tell-tale hill at the surface that identify them to scientists."

Compressive stresses and tell-tale hills are what exist in the Yakima fold and thrust belt. But there is more to this story.

Regarding the devastating Bam earthquake, the article declares: "This previously unknown fault was not associated with any surface features."

This is something to note, especially when considering the region where the Hanford Nuclear Reservation resides.

The article goes on to say: "Even very recent buildings - less than 10 years old - were brought down by this earthquake because the shaking was so strong."





Fault Lines

The webpage linked below speaks of an interconnected system of faults which are beneath and pass through the Cascade Mountains.

This interconnected fault system joins with those in the Puget Sound area and extends southeast, toward the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and beyond.

The page below states that "longer fault systems generally produce larger quakes..."

In speaking of the Cascade Mountains, the article indicates that "the faults formed long before the range's volcanoes did." This is very true. There is a lot more to this story.



The report linked below is an indepth study of the fault system which extends from the Puget Sound region, beneath the Cascade Mountains and into southeast Washington.



The webpage linked below states: "The new evidence suggests that the region could be rocked by shaking two to three times stronger than the [Hanford nuclear] plant was designed for." The faults in the area now appear to extend deeper into the earth than formerly believed. The article declares: "Deeper faults can produce bigger quakes."







The Lineament

This discussion speaks of fault lines which pass from the Puget Sound area, under the Cascade Mountains and into southeastern Washington.

This concept in nothing unusual. Let us not forget about the immense, Olympic-Wallowa Lineament (OWL).

The Wikepedia article linked below declares that the OWL "is a physiographic feature of unknown origin in the state of Washington (northwestern U.S.) running approximately from the town of Port Angeles, on the Olympic Peninsula to the Wallowa Mountains of eastern Oregon."



It is of interest to note that Rattlesnake Mountain is related to the immense Olympic-Wallowa Lineament. Rattlesnake Mountain is on the southwest side of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

The relation between Rattlesnake Mountain and Hanford Nuclear Reservation can clearly be seen in the drawing linked here.

The picture, linked here, shows a nuclear reactor building at Hanford, with Rattlesnake Mountain rising behind it.

This link also shows the relationship between Hanford and Rattlesnake Mountain (to the left of Hanford). Note also the geologic feature coming from the top-left of the picture and passing directly into Hanford.

Yes, the signs exist. There are natural triggers in the area which could ultimately bring devastation to Hanford.

Devastation at Hanford does not simply have to be a result of poor engineering. But, poor engineering opens the door for a more serious and catastrophic disaster in the event of a mega-quake.





To Consider

A M9.0 or larger Cascadia subduction zone earthquake has been spoken about for quite some time. This, in itself, is one very major thing. But the author believes there is more to the earthquake equation than simply that shown by the standard Cascadia subduction zone model.

Science has mapped the ocean bottom and understands what is happening at the edge of the continent. It speaks about a subduction zone. But, what is the structure below on which the continent rests? Yes, what is beneath the continent itself?

The author believes there may be a north-south aligned rift system deep under Washington, Oregon and California, possibly under the western part. What makes him think such a thing?

Let us begin to "connect the dots."

It is known that the continental mass is of a lighter weight rock, so it basically "floats" on top of the ocean floor and mantle materials. The theory of drifting continents is commonly believed in science. Many have their opinions of how things moved and will move. This link from the Internet is just one example. Here is another.

Science teaches that North America moved westward across the ocean, ages ago. It also teaches about the ridge and rift system which is like a fracture-line that passes through the oceans of the world.

A southern portion of the rift resides in the Gulf of California, between mainland Mexico and Baja California. This map of the rift system shows it going into or under the North American continent in the Gulf of California, but shows no more of it.

Where is the portion of the rift which extends north from the Gulf of California? Let us consider this thought further.

When the North American landmass took its westward trip across the face of the earth, in ancient times, it is reasonable to believe that it overrode the rift system. The northern portion of the rift is now located under the continent, possibly somewhere deep under the Interstate-5 corridor, or even under the Cascade Mountains.

This rift system is spoken about in more detail in the lower panel in the main section of this page.

A rift located deep under the I-5 corridor or the Cascade Mountains would possibly make sense, considering all the volcanoes in the Cascade Mountains. There are also about 95 volcanic vents in the Portland metro area, plus volcanic vents on the other side of the Cascades Mountains. These may have all been fed by "The Big Guy" deep below.

A deep-seated rift under the I-5 corridor or the Cascade Mountains could place a trigger for the next mega-quake much closer to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

A rupturing rift in this locale could have a great affect on the fault lines in the I-5 corridor, in the Puget Sound region, and those which pass under the Cascade Mountains toward the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

This rift and fault situation could have a great affect on the degree of shaking experienced at the Hanford nuclear facility when the next mega-quake breaks loose.

The radiation spread created by this type of disaster could be very devastating. It could readily spread over a large area of the United States and possibly even parts of Canada, if not beyond.











DOE & Eugenics

The U.S. DOE is involved with programs for "genetic enhancement." A similar concept is what the Nazi eugenicists were working with in the days of Adolf Hitler.

The link below indicates that the Nazis were working to improve the gene pool for the Germanic master race "through eugenics."




Genetic Enhancement

The link below speaks about the program the DOE is involved with. It speaks of "altering the human species through genetic enhancement."

The page states: "The National Human Genome Research Institute, under whose authority the grant was awarded, has overseen, along with the Department of Energy, the project to map the entire human genetic blueprint."




DOE Genetic Projects

The link below accesses a page with links to DOE genetic projects.



What is the DOE up to these days? This project appears to be very questionable.


Project Funding

The link below states that the the Joint Genome Institute in California is "funded by the Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research."




Eugenics Movement

The document linked below speaks of the eugenics movement in the 1900s. Its purpose was to "produce a super race of humans."

Of the eugenics movement, the document states: "It reached its most horrifying expression during the 'reign' of the Third Reich under Adolph Hitler.

The document mentions "a real danger that the dissemination of information about the genetic code could facilitate the rise of a neo-Eugenics movement."



Could it also be said that the dissemination of information about the genetic code may readily facilitate the rise of a neo-Nazi type of movement?

Upon further consideration, are the eugenists and the Nazis simply two faces of the same thing? Was not Hitler and the Nazis inspired by materials presented to them by the American eugenics movement?


Necessary Questions

Isn't the DOE supposed to be about energy? Why are they involved with genetics alteration and so-called enhancement programs? Why are they involved with cracking the genetic code? What is their purpose here? Who is in control here?


Ionizing Radiation

Does the DOE and genetic "enhancement" all fit in with nuclear energy and ionizing radiation in the environment.

Is it possible for ionizing radiation to cause sterilizations or serious mutations, and even major birth defects?

Can ionizing radiation in the environment have a detrimental affect, including the potential for altering future generations?

Could this ionizing radiation be used as a vehicle for forced population control or reduction, or like Hitler and the Nazis, in an attempt to produce the super race?

The DOE tampering with genetic modification tends to put them in a questionable position. It does have shades of Nazi Germany and human experimentation.


The Human Code

The document linked below declares:

"Human genetics became an enlightened endeavor in the late twentieth century. Hard-working, devoted scientists finally cracked the human code through the Human Genome Project. Now, every individual can be biologically identified and classified by trait and ancestry."

"Yet even now, some leading voices in the genetic world are calling for a cleansing of the unwanted among us, and even a master human species."



Yes, the American eugenics movement is rising to complete power again. The international eugenics movement will utterly dominate the world, at least for a period of time.

What will be coming upon this earth next? What will we see in the times ahead? How will people be reacting to those things which they see coming upon the earth?


Prophetic Words

In answer to the last words in the section above, this may be the place for a few words of prophecy. It is written in the Bible:

"And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken."

KJV  Luke 21:25-26


The DOE and Nazis

To consider the DOE, the Nazis and the eugenics movement further, the lower portion of the webpage linked below contains a considerable amount of "food for thought."



Many questions about why things are happening the way they are in our world may readily be answered in the webpage linked above.


Returning to Hanford

Is there a reason why the DOE is blatantly forcing their way and running roughshod over the citizens of the Pacific Northwest, regarding the Hanford Nuclear Reservation?

Is there a reason why they appear to be allowing substandard equipment to be installed at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation?

Is there a reason why the DOE is so hell-bent on using Hanford as the National Radioactive and Chemical Waste Dump?

Is there a reason why the DOE is so hell-bent on building a sensitive Vitrification Plant in a seismically dangerous region? What is the true agenda here?

Yes, there may be much more to the story than the average citizen ever really wanted to know. But, it is time to "face the tiger" and deal with it.





Vitrification Plant

The highly radioactive Hanford Nuclear Reservation is not just a mess, it is a world-class environmental disaster of the worst type. But strange things have been happening with the "cleanup" operation. Possibly something else is going on at Hanford, besides a genuine cleanup operation.


Waste Isolation Plant

In all of this, the radioactive accident at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico should be noted. Because of the accident, it appears the WIPP will not be accepting highly radioactive nuclear materials from around the nation, including that from Hanford. Things appear to be at a standstill.


Yucca Mountain

To make matters worse, Obama closed the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Repository project in Nevada. Now there is no place to put all the high-level and dangerous, radioactive waste from around the nation. So, what will be done now?


Ship It To Hanford

It appears the DOE will now ship high-level nuclear waste and dangerous chemicals from around the nation to the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. In all of this, some questions come to mind.


Cautious Inquiry

What will be the true purpose and intent of the Vitrification Plant at the Hanford site? Before we answer this question, let us consider some history.


Some History

In former times, the military-industrial complex used nuclear facilities for making nuclear bombs.

Then the military-industrial complex came out with the next generation of nuclear weapons. These are the "depleted uranium" weapons, which seem to cause just as much problems for our own people as for the enemies of the powers that be. So, it may be time to consider the next questions.


Crucial Questions

Will the Vitrification Plant at Hanford be used to produce an even more advanced, next generation of nuclear weapons?

Will the Vit Plant be used to create nuclear weapons from the waste which is transported into the nuclear facility? Will it make the next generation of nuclear weapons from the radioactive and toxic "witches brew" in the defective storage tanks at Hanford?

I am sure by the time all things are said and done, we will all know the true answers to these questions, whether or not we ever wanted to know.





Of Interest

The webpage linked below is about the Idaho Nationa Laboratory. It also includes some information about the Hanford Green Run and Operation Bluenose.

Once the file is open in your browser, open it in Adobe Reader for clear viewing.



The link above also speaks of something else which is very interesting. It speaks of the secret Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program from the 1950s.

These special atomic jet aircraft spewed a considerable amount of radiation directly into the atmosphere. That radioactivity was ultimately there for all to breath and ingest.

The ANP test program operated from 1955 until it was wisely canceled by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, about 2 years before he was assassinated.









Safe Nuclear ?

Is there a safe form of nuclear power? Is there a form which would truly be safe for the general public and the environment? Is there a safe form which its products could not be used for making nuclear weapons?

The webpage linked below speaks of "a nuclear technology that has all the advantages of traditional nuclear and none of the drawbacks. Its name is thorium."



According to the article above, thorium for use in fueling clean and safe types of nuclear reactors "is abundant." It also states that thorium type nuclear reactors do not experience meltdowns, like those which have happened at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima, just to name a few.


Any Waste Problem ?

But, what about thorium fuel? Will its use create just as much radioactive waste as that created by our present nuclear reactors? The article indicates that there is relatively little waste. It says that "the little waste it does produce is potentially recyclable."


A Question

This is interesting! Because of safety and environmental issues, why are not thorium-fueled nuclear reactors in common use around the world?


The Answer

The answer is, because of warmongers who are determined to keep the means for producing their weapons of mass destruction.

It is like a disease with them. They lust for weapons which can exterminate the human race many times over.





More On Thorium

The webpage linked below shows one method for producing power using thorium as the main fuel.

In this instance, the special fuel rods do use a small core of uranium to cause the necessary reactions in the thorium to obtain useful heat for power production.

These rods are meant for use in standard nuclear reactors, replacing the standard uranium fuel rods.




Proton Beam System

There is a safer method for using thorium as a fuel. This method does not need uranium or plutonium to initiate or sustain the reaction.

The safer method uses an "accelerator-driven sub-critical reactor." This technology is introduced in the page linked below.

The webpage declares: "The extra neutrons needed for achieving criticality would be provided by an external source - a particle accelerator.

In this case, if something goes wrong in the system, you simply turn off the particle accelerator and the reaction stops.




Energy Amplifier

The energy amplifier uses a particle beam to cause a material like thorium to react. The webpage linked below declares that the process "releases enough energy to power the particle accelerator and leave an energy profit for power generation."



The document linked below is a more indepth presentation on the use of particle beams for reacting things like thorium. The author of this work is well known in his field. His name is Carlo Rubbia.



The document linked below gives further details about an accelerator driven thorium reactor.



The document linked below presents a depleted uranium excited, thorium fueled system. This is interesting information, though it is not as environmentally friendly as the accelerator driven reactors.







Plain Reality

Will environmentally friendly thorium-fueled nuclear reactors come into common use?

It appears very unlikely. Serious research on the Internet indicates that thorium-fueled reactors are much harder to use for the production of nuclear weapons.

The powers that be appear to be into technologies with direct military applications. Therefore, they do not need or want such a system.

It appears that the necessary funding for thorium-fueled, accelerator-driven reactors is very hard, if not almost impossible to obtain.

Unfortunately, research and development follows the money.





Back to Hanford

There are still many things to consider about "the Hanford picture" and the U.S. Department of Energy (formerly the Atomic Energy Commission - AEC). A number of interesting pieces of information will be presented in the sections below.





Dirty Secrets

The 2014 videos linked below are from KING 5 news in Seattle, WA. They present the Hanford Dirty Secrets.

The first video is a 15 minute presentation on a leaking, double shell tank which holds some of the most dangerous waste known to mankind.

The second video presents more information and is about 29 minutes long.

The third video is the long version of the presentation. It is about 54 minutes long.

The videos speak about the ongoing, leaking, dangerous radioactive mess at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, plus the questionable practices being used there.



The videos have much good information that is worth seeing. But, there is one minor flaw in the information.

These videos tend to leave the impression that the Columbia River is not yet contaminated.

Other information presented on this webpage clearly shows that the river has actually been seriously contaminated for decades.





River & Uranium

The article linked below declares: "About 330 pounds of uranium per year is released to the Columbia River from the Hanford 300 Area, according to DOE."

The map linked here shows the 300 Area in the lower right corner. It is located just north and a little upstream from Richland, Washington.







Irradiated River

The page linked below declares that "the DOE said for decades that tank wastes would take 10,000 years to reach the ground water. It got there in less than 40."

The page also declares: "DOE officials admitted in 1991 that managers dumped 440 billion gallons of radioactive liquids directly into the soil - using ditches, cribs, trenches and injection wells - and that hazardous waste had fouled the Columbia River."



The page above also speaks of accidents at Hanford and health issues experienced by people in the region.





Human Radiation Experiments

The links in this section access text documents from the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.


Richland and Hanford

The link below, from October 19, 1994, is about the Richland, Washington Operations.

This document speaks about Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL, now PNNL or Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) experiments during the Walla Walla prisoner study and the Promethium studies.

The document notes many human radiation experiments from 1952 to 1968. It speaks about data gathering on schoolchildren. It speaks of "13 cubic feet of documentation."

The document declares that "the lead laboratory for these studies was Lawrence Livermore" in California.



The document above speaks about intentional releases of radiation upon the general public during the Green Run, in 1944, performed at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. It speaks about radiation releases into the environment in 1962 and 1963, plus multiple releases during Project Bluenose.


November 21 Meeting

The two documents linked below are almost identical copies. Both links are presented here in case one link becomes unusable.

One view expressed in the documents linked below is that "human radiation experiments and intentional releases were crimes against humanity and violations of criminal statutes." The documents speak of "testicular irradiation experiments" between 1963 to 1970. These experiments present shades of the diabolic eugenics movement and Nazi Germany.



The documents above speak of the Green Run at Hanford, plus other intentional releases of radiation and experiments upon the general public in 1945, 1946, 1951 and 1963. They speak of experiments on schoolchildren. The problems experienced by Hanford Downwinders are also presented.

The documents speak of several downwinders who "expressed their anger and frustration at being harmed by the government and not being told the truth, even today." They speak of the intentional radiation releases on the general public as being the "genocide of the American people."

When considering these things, it should be noted that Nazi nuclear scientists were illegally brought into the United States during the World War Two era and put into the nuclear industry. It should also be noted that the Nazis were eugenicists and readily performed human experimentation.

It appears that the eugenicists did not lose the Second World War. Not by a long shot. They are alive and well today, and stronger than ever.


A Document

The link below accesses a large, 28 MB PDF document which "provides a catalog of the location of large numbers of reports pertaining to the charge of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Research." The second link is the same document in another format.







Eugenics

For a person to truly understand why things are happening the way they are upon our earth, a person should do an in-depth study of the eugenics movement.

A person could also come to a better understanding of why the economies of our earth are not in great shape, with so many people out of work.





Employment

The author has a number of practical skills to offer. He is currently accepting offers of work to help provide for life's necessities.

Besides performing research and writing, the author has many other areas of interest and experience which could be valuable in employment situations. To view the author's online resume, simply click on this link.

If you know of anyone who could benefit from the author's skills and experience, please pass this information along to them.

Thank you for your generosity and support of the author and his vital needs in the employment arena.





Radiation Spread

As the author has researched the situation at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation regarding the spread of radiation via the complex underground aquifer system, he has formed a number of conclusions.

One of his conclusions regards the general direction which the radioactive materials in the regional aquifer system are spreading out from the Hanford site.


Benton City Wells

In his research, the author found that off-site spread of uranium from Hanford first appears to be mentioned at wells for Benton City.

Contamination in Benton City wells occurred by mid 1947. It should be noted that Benton City is located by the Yakima River, about 20 miles from the center of Hanford.


The Yakima River

It is interesting to note that the Yakima River discharges the greatest amount of uranium into the Columbia River, of all the sources noted in this link.

The Yakima River is said to discharge 8,800 pounds of uranium into the Columbia River per year.

The link above does not mention any other radioactive elements. Why? Are no other Hanford contaminants being tested for in the Yakima River?


An Indicator

The high uranium contamination in the Yakima River tends to indicate that wastes from Hanford are generally spreading out the fastest in a south to southwest direction in the underground aquifer and regional water system.

A general spread in this direction would cause radioactive waste from Hanford to more readily contaminate the Yakima River region. Then, the Yakima River dumps its large load of radioactive contamination into the Columbia River on the downstream end of Richland, Washington (as seen on the map linked here).


May Junction Fault

The document linked below (on Adobe Reader, page 2 of 23) speaks of a "southwest flow beneath B Pond to the 200 East Area. Eastward flow away from the region of elevated water levels does not occur; this is attributed to the May Junction Fault, located east of B Pond, which is thought to be a hydrologic barrier preventing flow to the east."

The B-Pond is shown near the center of the map (on Adobe Reader, page 8 of 12) in this link. The verified portion of the May Junction Fault is shown on the pages which follow (pages 9, 11 and 12). This link (Document Number: PNNL-12261, April 2000, on Adobe Reader, page 12 of 101) calls this geologic feature "the buried May Junction Fault lineament."

Because the May Junction Fault is called a lineament, that would cause the author to believe that there are other features in the area, particularly in a southward direction, which may be a continuation of this fault lineament. This matter will be discussed shortly.

The above-linked document (on Adobe Reader, page 4 of 23) also states: "The May Junction Fault, located east of B Pond and in a north-south trend, acts as a barrier to groundwater flow in the unconfined aquifer and the confined aquifer within the Ringold Formation. It may also impede the movement of water in the upper basalt-confined aquifer system."



The document linked here (on Adobe Reader, page 12 of 20) shows an west-east cross-section of the May Junction Fault.

The document linked here (on Adobe Reader, page 12 of 28) states that the east side of the fault is "displaced vertically downward about 185 feet."





A Lineament

In the section above, the May Junction Fault is clearly termed as "the buried May Junction Fault lineament." This term has been used in a Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) publication. The PNNL is associated with the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and U.S. DOE. Therefore, it is time to examine the use of this particular geologic term.

This source defines a lineament as being "a linear topographic feature of regional extent that is believed to reflect underlying crustal structure."

Please note the use of the word "regional" in the above definition.

This Wikipedia entry adds to the above definition by stating: "Typically a lineament will comprise a fault-aligned valley, a series of fault or fold-aligned hills, a straight coastline or indeed a combination of these features."

This document from the University of Bergen, Norway (on Adobe Reader, page 1 of 10), states that "surface and subsurface drainage is partly controlled by lineaments."

The University of Bergen document, linked above (on Adobe Reader, page 8 of 10), states that "topo lineaments, being linear or near-linear depressions, also serve as a framework for river flow."

The document above also states that "the distribution of river segments is similar to that of the lineaments, indicating that rivers and streams tend to follow the lineaments."

It is also said, in the document linked above, that "little associated surface runoff along lineaments may indicate high subsurface drainage."

This information about lineaments and the control of "surface and subsurface drainage" is important. So is the reference to lineaments serving "as a framework for river flow."

This information leads into the section which follows.





The River Gap

It should be noted that at Benton City, the Yakima River makes an abrupt turn to the north. It continues on this northward path for about 6 miles, while passing through a break or gap in the segmented geologic fold composed of the much higher Rattlesnake Mountain (to the west) and the much lower Red Mountain (to the east).

The break in the segmented geologic fold is called the Yakama River water gap.  This water gap is located in a "relatively undeformed" area "where two fold segments plunge together," as noted in this document called 'Volcanism and Tectonism in the Columbia River Flood-basalt Province, Issue 239', on page 251.

It appears that some very major geologic forces acted upon the geologic fold at this location and caused the major gap where resides the Yakima River. The major geologic forces caused the eastern segment of the fold, called Red Mountain, to be much lower than the western portion of the fold, called Rattlesnake Mountain.

If a line is drawn through the entrance and exit points of the Yakima River water gap, it would generally point toward the north-south aligned May Junction Fault lineament, on the east side of the Hanford 200 Area. The area to the east of this north-south fault line is also dropped down or lower, similar to the lower, eastern segment of the geologic fold at the Yakima River water gap.

It appears that geologic forces may have formed a type of north-south aligned lineament in this area on which resides the Yakima River water gap and the more northerly May Junction Fault. A paragraph in the section above notes the potential for a high subsurface drainage along lineaments.

Benton city resides at an elevation of about 499 feet above sea level. The Hanford 200 West Area resides at an elevation somewhere near 676 feet above sea level. The Hanford 200 East Area resides at an elevation somewhere near 679 feet above sea level.

Considering the difference in elevation and the north-south aligned geology in the area, is it any wonder that uranium showed up in Benton City wells about 2-1/2 years after Hanford started injecting nuclear wastes into the ground at the 200 Area in 1945?





Injection Wells

Injection wells used at Hanford were also known as reverse wells.

The diagram, linked here, shows different ways that waste was disposed of at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

The left side of the diagram shows the use of reverse wells. Note that Cesium-137, Strontium-90 and Plutonium were injected directly into the aquifer.

The article linked below, under the section heading of 'The Problems,' shows that between 1945 and 1947 "about 11 million gallons of liquid radioactive waste were pumped down two deep injection wells directly into the aquifer. The liquid contained about 16 pounds of plutonium. The wells were closed when plutonium was found miles away, but still on the Hanford site."



In a rather short period of time, plutonium was found miles away (yes, that is miles away) from the injection wells.





Burp and Belch

At Hanford Nuclear Reservation are 177 underground storage tanks which hold extremely dangerous nuclear waste.  A 2013 Scientific American article, linked here, states: "Overall, the tanks hold every element in the periodic table, including half a ton of plutonium, various uranium isotopes and at least 44 other radionuclides - containing a total of about 176 million curies of radioactivity."


An Article

A 1997 article, linked here, declares the following about the 177 underground waste tanks at Hanford:

"For several decades, more than a third of these huge tanks have burped, rumbled and leaked. Some belched hydrogen and ammonia gas; others are dangerously hot, causing cracks and bulges in the tank walls and floors."

The article states that "some have belched hydrogen gas with enough force to buckle their metal lids."

This brings us to our next subject.





The Groundwater

The webpage, linked here, gives a partial list of radioactive materials which were "found in the groundwater beneath Hanford by congressional investigators." The list includes the following:

Plutonium, uranium, tritium, strontium-90, cesium-137, iodine-129 and technetium-99.

Radioactive wastes were, in the early stages of Hanford, injected into the aquifer via injection wells (also called reverse wells). The flow of the aquifer could then move these wastes wherever it desired.

Could these radioactive waste materials congregate into something which could start mini reactions underground in the aquifer, especially if a neutron producing material like aluminum, boron, beryllium, lithium or fluorine got mixed up in the "nuclear soup?"

The decay of uranium and other radioactive materials can produce alpha, beta or gamma radiation. These particles react with neutron producing materials to produce a shower of neutrons. Could the shower of neutrons keep an uncontrolled nuclear chain reaction going for a certain period of time? What could be the result of such an event?





Aqueous Reactor

We commonly think of nuclear reactors as having regular fuel rods. But there is another type of reactor which has no fuel rods. It is called the aqueous homogeneous reactor.

The Wikipedia page linked here declares: "Aqueous homogeneous reactors (AHR) are a type of nuclear reactor in which soluble nuclear salts (usually uranium sulfate or uranium nitrate) are dissolved in water."

Let us now consider one fact.

There was a lot of uranium and other radioactive elements which were injected into the aquifer system below Hanford in earlier times.

Is there any possibility that these materials, if congregated by Nature, could produce a type of uncontrolled aqueous homogeneous reactor beneath Hanford?





Nature's Reactor

The article linked here, from years back, declares the following:

"To operate a nuclear power plant like Three Mile Island, hundreds of highly trained employees must work in concert to generate power from safe fission, all the while containing dangerous nuclear wastes."

"On the other hand, it's been known for 30 years that Mother Nature once did nuclear chain reactions by her lonesome." This occurred in what is now Gabon, West Africa.

The article states that Nature's nuclear reactor "worked on a 30-minute reaction cycle, accompanied by a two-and-a-half hour dormant period, or cool down."

What would it be like if a similar phenomenon occurred within the nuclear waste in the aquifer below the Hanford Nuclear Reservation?

Could steam produced during such a reaction produce "fracking" of the surrounding rock structure? Could this produce low-intensity earthquake swarms?





Hanford Quakes

The webpage linked here presents information about earthquakes and earthquake swarms at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

Once again, could there be any connection between all the hydraulically transported nuclear waste which was deposited deep in the aquifers via reverse or injection wells?

Could radioactive fuels become concentrated and lodged in certain areas of the complex aquifer system?

Could underground concentrations of radioactive fuels periodically begin to react? Once again, could this result in earthquake swarms?





Oil and Gas

The article linked below, from 1987, states: "Major oil companies believe there may be a huge reserve of oil and natural gas under the Hanford Nuclear Reservation..."

The article declares: "Evidence of oil or natural gas at Hanford would disqualify the federal reservation from consideration as the nation's first high-level nuclear waste site," under "The Nuclear Waste Policy Act."



Interesting enough, the U.S. DOE is doing everything possible to prevent oil companies from exploring anywhere on the Hanford site.

The article states: "From 1978 to 1986, the Energy Department refused 135 requests for oil and gas leases on the reservation.

Is the DOE afraid that exploratory drilling might turn up a considerably larger amount of mobile radioactive contamination than is currently known?

On the other hand, possibly the DOE is concerned about the radiation hazard which may be presented to a drilling crew who bored into underground nuclear wastes.

Possibly it is just easier for the DOE to refuse drilling permits at Hanford, rather than letting the public know that there is a much greater problem beneath Hanford, and in the surrounding region, than the agency has been telling the public all along.